From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3556138A2F for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC75EE0D19; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9029E0D0A for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot.lan (77-254-95-248.adsl.inetia.pl [77.254.95.248]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D391B34012A; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:01:21 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?B?TWljaGGzIEfzcm55?= To: Ian Stakenvicius Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings ) Message-ID: <20140812210121.0d2b52ca@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <53EA1F0A.8010907@gentoo.org> References: <20140810152211.2cc5ae94@sf> <20140812014820.GA3086@linux1> <53E97502.40604@gentoo.org> <20140812024257.GA3262@linux1> <53EA0CC6.6050000@gentoo.org> <53EA1C86.6070800@gentoo.org> <53EA1F0A.8010907@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/ss3ONO.=EusvVj3aXPBhuiS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 6bec15ba-e269-477b-b543-559c02177332 X-Archives-Hash: 58d4b55903e663cd79e6b53909f2b682 --Sig_/ss3ONO.=EusvVj3aXPBhuiS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2014-08-12, o godz. 10:04:58 Ian Stakenvicius napisa=B3(a): > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 >=20 > On 12/08/14 09:54 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >=20 > > Perhaps we need to have a less-important repoman warning level=20 > > (something that can be quieted with a flag) for things like this? > > In terms of DESCRIPTION consistency I don't see it being a bad > > thing that we have the warning, but i also don't see a point in > > changing the entire tree to get rid of 3000 bytes, esp. since the > > ChangeLog entries added to the tree will add at least 30,000 bytes > > :) > >=20 >=20 > I'm wondering what everyone thinks of having a --nonag option to > repoman and shoving some of the more trivial/style-related repoman > 'warnings' into a 'nag' level warning? IIRC at least one of the QA > team members is so tired of the warnings that they want to make every > single one of them errors; the --nonag option would allow those > warnings to remain in repoman (ie to help guide new dev's or non-dev's > using repoman on their local repos) but since they don't relate to > actual technical breakage they can just be turned off during QA runs, etc. Just don't. I think you missed the point hard and I don't want to know where the ricochet ended. First of all, the QA's issue is not really about verbosity of repoman. It's more about developers who ignore repoman output and commit broken ebuilds which QA needs to fix afterwards. '--nonag' would mean that some developers will introduce even more warnings for others... Secondly, AutoRepoman is already filtering repoman's output. If Patrick disliked a particular warning, he'd filter it already. He doesn't need easy-available repoman option for that. Thirdly, I'm pretty sure I had a third argument but I forgot what it was. But it was totally convincing, I'm sure of it. --=20 Best regards, Micha=B3 G=F3rny --Sig_/ss3ONO.=EusvVj3aXPBhuiS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJT6mSCXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOkxcQANHfcPbX1+Hs4hssxGvLOuie GmIUukyLZGhE0/PI7z1ClGSKN/+GhsWKF7JGZiBtaepxX3XZsF4OZr+ABLxr0rTn pHOgb2Qoiwc9dR+rVmpXBoJfI+DBQ6dBhFEUMsKmjHFPyyArigwOzerPb2AaE+8M ZZ8bHDt60Lgs5Of8jONq65iBXk8NrtLf6NgtpHjbgJfvo9eHiH4jUCfD+GvbOG0w T8Xe2aPE56+wVMMxHb/CaVfKR1pz23UdYbzZVGlBjFOxcrxA94qdkwSY0S0OpC4/ mhtoJUqOnKSiTvMifS5ip3HxHbpeuTTe1WwC9y4nRTWL4ukERVTtRoMSGtwJ6tAg sFFFVsDIW2+Ts8+j/VhIVzxt3h1X9srEucP4Xj9hs1ey9joNTcdcuoYBjkHPMu4q 98TcmAuVhhriEkrGFcy6XETSvy0prAlBkuinh4C9f86MyqQ/WtgPWPZ/O2kkKm+s xyGnvIFkJOjLlBbtPzKQT3GwjrXQQnFu/DCywIAu93LHCkWNRFU6JRR8yBTrdsQY hG2j8r8teQf+vOMeaXaZw7vmUigenkhAU14KR+oyE41QDCEdbQYaTomdz4lYFH2y MGXeSmDWv3/zFLgJiacp7IDBwF8ZJn4pySqLQ2nCIfFTSPfODsM9/2ASzxgqsYDm o59F4YcjiIuwZPE3YBt7 =vETq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ss3ONO.=EusvVj3aXPBhuiS--