From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5BC13877A for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 02:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A824E0B6A; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 02:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com (mail-oi0-f48.google.com [209.85.218.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 033C1E0B63 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 02:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f48.google.com with SMTP id h136so6132730oig.21 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:43:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=yLCvTSmjH7veWd2mqKXT1pVjyt6XBl08TsTdeI8tsjM=; b=j7bK1lmwGxrCn4+9AMhMNxFdgJLP/jzuXodKM+bfJfwZAgXeeyjTQky3UM1SDzV+pI 8sjuYezIADIHObr9Mjmgs1N7Qtzx8aTh9ecGYr4YxntnPGXbtgLdIe1LwpYTShAvjTRs zZGTcYg/kl5oL+5pO4E35+C9D0A0mV7M11OHHAiLL8IyD3vWYKM9ng/mcnbku0yBTpiQ 14kWxu8e9TUKggCSfoArqo32WPn68GrULUSo7J5csCOtFhN9Oxul7NoXp5j+5NzbTC1+ hoh0FlirzyGWJZy7XTWtHRD0Yprgm4rpGNzDpBSXSxRwp1DMr7k2Y57J/Qdoxh0L7nVj LFLQ== X-Received: by 10.60.68.41 with SMTP id s9mr1633049oet.30.1407811380904; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:43:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id to6sm2714712obb.6.2014.08.11.19.42.59 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: (nullmailer pid 3314 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 12 Aug 2014 02:42:57 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 21:42:57 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings Message-ID: <20140812024257.GA3262@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20140810152211.2cc5ae94@sf> <20140812014820.GA3086@linux1> <53E97502.40604@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53E97502.40604@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Archives-Salt: 05c0a8df-f5a6-487b-addc-1dae923eb76a X-Archives-Hash: dac09ecb32f12a37712451c035228120 --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:59:30AM +0200, Manuel R=FCger wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 =20 *snip* > These links might be helpful: >=20 > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=3Dproj/portage.git;a=3Dcommit;h= =3D06637c4215d55c57517739214c6e0fd6f8f53914 >=20 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D438976 >=20 > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/80786 >=20 >=20 > What's still missing is a patch for devmanual (if we still really want > to enforce this). I read the thread, and there was no concensus about making this a repoman check. Some people thought it was a good idea, but there was a feeling that this sort of thing is trivial and shouldn't be worried about. William --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlPpfzEACgkQblQW9DDEZTj13ACdF/a0BX9dLKJ4dB1KFQ5V9k0n POcAoJ/cUymB3cfUCKIC34uqrevLL6RD =7DOU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --huq684BweRXVnRxX--