From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-67205-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F8413877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:48:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20AB3E0AFB;
	Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:48:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-f49.google.com (mail-oa0-f49.google.com [209.85.219.49])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22D3CE0AD5
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:48:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id eb12so6745189oac.22
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
         :user-agent;
        bh=imVP+ioSDUaRv6LwUjcngqOyiWFZDXK3tDexSkXqTBs=;
        b=QSKxJcQEh/cUj5oxyvt5gL2VTUirX522Og6LTp9aMWv0xWVLgEbe/hVdGQVUjfAB7W
         7C6gUVM/OmLr4yVZOU99AMKeJP40mobbggntwmSyjdOXfWXSE7+FFLxWv3qfKiZZPTP8
         341ikEXX9OdIKZx83jA5Xpfi0gMXQ6fnUnq+GomLwrQ+db3+Fn5DF8kpS0d/1ZeFTzk6
         y91iWJFanl1Cufm+6ObzZYRVzKs8y4RzrIVHa3LlaxLHvWnFtZSBFU2Z6PgH5krSHXCH
         2h1FMkXs+yd4uEu4Ry5wD+X2KHVQQfFegXIQr1X1D5yefslXc78Ola3BKiCkKZJCW8cs
         A4PQ==
X-Received: by 10.60.115.133 with SMTP id jo5mr1410345oeb.39.1407808103850;
        Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u5sm2555406obt.18.2014.08.11.18.48.21
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: (nullmailer pid 3170 invoked by uid 1000);
	Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:48:20 -0000
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:48:20 -0500
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with
 a '.' character' warnings
Message-ID: <20140812014820.GA3086@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <20140810152211.2cc5ae94@sf>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140810152211.2cc5ae94@sf>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Archives-Salt: ed92933d-5d08-4aee-825b-5fc67d94c83c
X-Archives-Hash: 3dc45332cae9f085557becc5e078f9ce


--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 03:22:11PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> Hello World!
>=20
> TL;DR:
>   This evening I plan to mangle ~3000 ebuilds in the main tree
>   by dropping trailing '.' in all 'DESCRIPTION=3D' fields (except "etc." =
case)
>=20
> Long story:
>=20
> As you may know newest portage release 2.2.11
> got a minor (but chatty) QA warning:
>     DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character

Why is this a QA warning in the first place?

I don't recall a policy mandating that descriptions can't end with '.'. I
asked our QA lead about it and was told that he didn't recall that we
have an official policy about it either. Also, the devmanual never
mentions any such requirement.

If someone can point me to something I'm missing, let me know.
Otherwise, I think the warning should be removed.

William

--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlPpcmQACgkQblQW9DDEZTjyWQCfRlLKPRkc8SRDV94cRqQUXgKl
kHIAnR6/o00D20EDhLsUHXMTUzD8yJwk
=rx2S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--