From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D068713877A for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:23:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F8A6E084F; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:23:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07003E07F9 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m15so1028242wgh.5 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 04:23:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=SZr9f8Vq/aovjdV6tUzWY8rsqKCBInSaC8pIq4C9B8M=; b=rHR0McMFjLJ+OWUmH7eGSV8TXaSWH+4Jhr8ZUgabxLdKrkJgpon8JwErO+31c96fY6 24br5/J2fWVQ8gtbdPSiYfgMtR0aF6se7XKBRbW8aJTxEKXr06iSeufu/oAza0qnnKBL 0bul2S+EW0jXn4QtkEyUkZFFyVGxFi3T661OOaX9UhoKnTpwiT/oghCQp/lmqSSK0Bqw a+CnTKxVpR7ExAFNfz+AdLMfSs3KziaXZrQZS+/JWocU1r1m6XhKKCXyGV9Ci4z5oGS7 2kH19td77bJngBNcBEcVxKLciABbP3z5SgVyYghbhl2OAKp6ZmbIlP4Z9Le9tw5z2Xds pRwg== X-Received: by 10.194.62.140 with SMTP id y12mr5307447wjr.27.1406719417187; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 04:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc2-broo7-2-0-cust637.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.11.186.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id es9sm4860292wjd.1.2014.07.30.04.23.36 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 04:23:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:23:29 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Message-ID: <20140730122329.0b1dee56@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <201407212153.04605.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20140721205527.142cb3d5@googlemail.com> <1405976767.1013.9.camel@gentoo.org> <53CE6CED.1060300@gentoo.org> <20140723004441.2e68c0b0@gentoo.org> <53D26D58.3000004@gentoo.org> <53D27343.6020009@gentoo.org> <20140726134907.621d8892@googlemail.com> <53D4E5A0.2020403@gentoo.org> <20140730084531.14a288fb@home.puleglot> <53D8847B.2070401@gentoo.org> <53D8A0E6.8000000@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/BMNQhIZHbKW3yLd.JdV09TM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 9aa9aebd-0283-4d67-bad2-479e7362bb0f X-Archives-Hash: 7781bc2955c40ebc0c288ef2bec24423 --Sig_/BMNQhIZHbKW3yLd.JdV09TM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:18:22 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > Sure, but this seems more like a portage bug (or at least a portage > output bug) rather than a fundamental issue. >=20 > After all, there was no true block - just a need for a rebuild. It's often not possible to produce a decent error message, given the limited information that ebuilds supply and the unnecessary pseudocleverness they employ to do it. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/BMNQhIZHbKW3yLd.JdV09TM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlPY1bQACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFbRQCfZTTDRZO445kHaBQPdAZWhppQ msAAoIpyRUy5lCzUcTZETzfAqB85/tAA =Hteq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/BMNQhIZHbKW3yLd.JdV09TM--