From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E1613877A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C862DE0D96; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB740E0B16 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id f8so3417081wiw.3 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:33:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=cDQCaxRgdQ0T8UItWpHh1+tg0D0opOUfXS3dtytvwCc=; b=q2CRZ/htNPgv6Iu4K7XwIowIhW8ESThMKOwAG79+fjbN2F2jtKc/7AFimS7MpMToR8 V8l+XCmABes03VJNsD6Vdh4dHGErcGKW8KNwZEpShpGCwgb0gToAcSHEpuAH4X9yKWAn 493UKcR04ZFiJ4vaZAKhwctCeGdbxjBAse4Kgg67ZQjYU/RsJJ3+lzFhb1tIsRwxRLCt lo/TpH2y42PiRB/29WNvMcdC6SIQMe8TlmxDi9p9lrIpCTHz/FGJkWlo5S0/9j/HZq2H Pt0VeHGsA2YafFn6ywWWuI8neiMcZ+znX49emomIlSqo3qakrjqkJ9cs1EWuhP1Uj++d OD7g== X-Received: by 10.180.24.34 with SMTP id r2mr24167108wif.46.1406496824459; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc2-broo7-2-0-cust637.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.11.186.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n2sm44292198wjf.40.2014.07.27.14.33.43 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:33:38 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Message-ID: <20140727223338.25c32791@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53CD8BBA.2010605@gentoo.org> <53D5072E.3030305@gentoo.org> <20140727222429.3febdefa@pomiot.lan> <20140727231701.68a980fc@pomiot.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/n3wQJ86=WOQugSAPPNz/8pi"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 97a0a477-5602-47ff-b90a-2ef04027bd8d X-Archives-Hash: 001e531c2385063fcc420c174ebac020 --Sig_/n3wQJ86=WOQugSAPPNz/8pi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 17:26:27 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > But, in that case you can put the necessary ebuilds into your overlay > and then portage can make everything right. Oh? Please explain to us a) how the overlay interaction *actually* works with dynamic dependencies currently, and b) how it can work both in the case you describe, and in the case where an overlay has a substantially different ebuild for the same package. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/n3wQJ86=WOQugSAPPNz/8pi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlPVcDUACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEVVACgmOA/dwFk4vnL75QD5QTwxKfa XtIAoLM4ULUWmvQgF2vCAOkIB0esV+Oh =qVJX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/n3wQJ86=WOQugSAPPNz/8pi--