From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9687013877A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06752E0D1D; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11237E0CF5 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot.lan (77-254-85-187.adsl.inetia.pl [77.254.85.187]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 293A333F900; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 15:47:56 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?B?TWljaGGzIEfzcm55?= To: Samuli Suominen Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Message-ID: <20140727154756.2571c50e@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <53D4E5A0.2020403@gentoo.org> References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <201407212153.04605.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20140721205527.142cb3d5@googlemail.com> <1405976767.1013.9.camel@gentoo.org> <53CE6CED.1060300@gentoo.org> <20140723004441.2e68c0b0@gentoo.org> <53D26D58.3000004@gentoo.org> <53D27343.6020009@gentoo.org> <20140726134907.621d8892@googlemail.com> <53D4E5A0.2020403@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/6=2DEto84daibf=CvrM/JAT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 4260f3e0-b59b-4ae4-abc8-7968fe658ada X-Archives-Hash: 6d5d9fa6fd75b37d3872050ff92d37d7 --Sig_/6=2DEto84daibf=CvrM/JAT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2014-07-27, o godz. 14:42:24 Samuli Suominen napisa=B3(a): >=20 > On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 +0000 (UTC) > > Martin Vaeth wrote: > >> hasufell wrote: > >>> Dynamics deps are already broken, not consistently enabled (e.g. > >>> when subslots are in use) > >> Just to make it clear: No, dynamic deps are not broken. > > Yes they are. >=20 > We just succesfully converted ~300 ebuilds in tree without revision > bumps from virtual/udev[gudev,introspection,static-libs] > to virtual/libudev and virtual/libgudev > Tested it on multiple boxes, went fine. How did you exactly test them? Did you at least bother checking if portage actually uses the deps you added? --=20 Best regards, Micha=B3 G=F3rny --Sig_/6=2DEto84daibf=CvrM/JAT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJT1QMMXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOtXEQAMWxuekUiyrFqgwO7FMiHitN t1Is/KjPGn3tcZ/vj94eyamPM0ey9XT2z1KiJR7CCIT3hDHax3MLiaM+DCpLt/7F HMig2whjXbvEjjIf5YXkMkllZ7zdGkJYcYZavWiTpEiKrfYr/wupYaMveift4YeA ggRqcV9dfCp9OGiAM5u31Mflq7OZWVXzBqlYDorISQ9XIMWoFFer/hjh8syeXAA8 dQjOOnfxgdFnZ2rKKrsW4YZvLBVAtzmBNqkWHaZxWLw8ihs2qnBmlpitlMS1sw4Q 76ArtOrly1slPYYEKyCn1GzCex8iKIvtwGDr5bzeWtpZR5PmZUg+ioqFX7xHNRh+ U7IUFpNa1sblnNoHILHgC92fexDeh6vTF+NKRtLv5v6i3y0xL3gM0PLGxjUhjpEM qtggWUr84TX47jKEIiY4lTrnoao28YyiNVr3HDx4QzwwAZorqEjyuO/Sbu0+o6mu te2xB85R8bvFDRbxvxfgs6laSnzrWaaZ+R1jSptcqC0QEN7cuwmGRF8ciFsgR6cB lSvX/o7JQUK3m7glnL6FWqmUssts/EKY7XF8+pOTrxkW+ASvURQXjh0sb4h0vHvK PMGZKDCHYjDTASf7VYJpDsMFvGkaJRoC9+XG3JMuHwjgd2QXTYRPG9PrqfkfoG1p QS7uxX3hJZHGXVdQ76gz =+r3X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/6=2DEto84daibf=CvrM/JAT--