From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EBE13877A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF804E0D15; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CC9EE0B8D for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:01:50 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyz+57jTVMtVX7771jWiJc= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (95-130-165-192.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [95.130.165.192]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 35.2 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id N01b4aq6RC1mREG (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:01:48 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Behaving productively on the list Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:01:47 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.21-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53D4E5A0.2020403@gentoo.org> <53D4E793.8010302@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53D4E793.8010302@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201407271401.47911.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 0a9ab5da-e74f-49b1-a670-9c322b18b66a X-Archives-Hash: e2b71ca86cce58679c397dbe53e58985 Am Sonntag, 27. Juli 2014, 13:50:43 schrieb hasufell: > > So, broken? Far from it. More like essential feature. > > I'm not sure if you realize that you just disabled dynamic deps support > on most of those converted ebuilds. PLEASE, everyone, don't just make statements like the the one above ^ but instead explain what has happened and best bring up a real-world example. "... of those converted ebuilds, because ....! For example, see ... which you just changed as follows: ... This has the consequence that ..." This will hopefully also cut down the pointless chatter "Yes you do. No you dont." -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/