From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B52313877A for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F686E0FFA; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 068ABE0FF5 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u56so5554462wes.14 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:42:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=6v1O80+DZuN9vpOiRAJg77x4v9CeRA27cIkAedRoKTA=; b=vBPCMbeve5kN1VdLvi9B6BymUvhY5zYQBlILHEdv2CdE5pGVtAIvi4FvUN/4ZafMMt b7zO9voey1FugzbLG7W32py8l9K5awilqVbZZuTDpTnot2EmTSwUf0exJMndcXJN7hUl oAvrkV3wOWD3MMIN2C3xluQpwQ4Bl/JG5zFy4L5Gy5ud7Yoq/mdJKxrW73wYC17k1RDJ e2GwWdQEAJBAAjoCHoHY/HEnxxxQ0DOh/DGMNYDUHMe3j0yn4u/sKUsOulnexSVdRcrn l0YsZetwSJ01T0hdwTnV9fJFUT79u1eVdMdycBfJqlffWtgeKJVlaK1Tga2F28/HLMhg O2dA== X-Received: by 10.180.19.97 with SMTP id d1mr15441740wie.19.1406400145678; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc2-broo7-2-0-cust637.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.11.186.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m8sm27112538wjy.35.2014.07.26.11.42.25 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 19:42:20 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Message-ID: <20140726194220.5a2a81f8@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53CD8BBA.2010605@gentoo.org> <20140726163242.389162b6@pomiot.lan> <20140726163923.6dd4da71@googlemail.com> <20140726171448.6bf23aed@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/wEC41LcdN.G03+t0LhUJqdL"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 621b8c33-ca29-4497-908f-847f987a5eb2 X-Archives-Hash: 2c7b6a7a0fcbc1cdfb8fa6eaacc80956 --Sig_/wEC41LcdN.G03+t0LhUJqdL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Martin Vaeth wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >> > * Overlays > >> Not an issue: Exactly the information of that ebuild > >> which *would* be used if you reemerge contains > >> the relevant data. > > > > The association between an installed package and "the ebuild it came > > from" doesn't work correctly when overlays around. >=20 > It doesn't have to: That ebuild which would be installed > *has* to carry the up-to-date information for that package. > Otherwise, the overlay is broken. An overlay is *not* a > different slot for a package. Uh huh, so you add an overlay, and suddenly the dependencies for a random subset of your installed packages change in ways that don't in any way reflect what you have installed. How is this the desired behaviour? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/wEC41LcdN.G03+t0LhUJqdL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlPT9o8ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGndgCgkhhIIpEjssbF7cc14p1m4sHP uLAAn3DTXPATfC+tlB2WwavOnOYlYWEe =9vas -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/wEC41LcdN.G03+t0LhUJqdL--