From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66953-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B52313877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:42:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F686E0FFA;
	Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:42:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 068ABE0FF5
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:42:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u56so5554462wes.14
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type;
        bh=6v1O80+DZuN9vpOiRAJg77x4v9CeRA27cIkAedRoKTA=;
        b=vBPCMbeve5kN1VdLvi9B6BymUvhY5zYQBlILHEdv2CdE5pGVtAIvi4FvUN/4ZafMMt
         b7zO9voey1FugzbLG7W32py8l9K5awilqVbZZuTDpTnot2EmTSwUf0exJMndcXJN7hUl
         oAvrkV3wOWD3MMIN2C3xluQpwQ4Bl/JG5zFy4L5Gy5ud7Yoq/mdJKxrW73wYC17k1RDJ
         e2GwWdQEAJBAAjoCHoHY/HEnxxxQ0DOh/DGMNYDUHMe3j0yn4u/sKUsOulnexSVdRcrn
         l0YsZetwSJ01T0hdwTnV9fJFUT79u1eVdMdycBfJqlffWtgeKJVlaK1Tga2F28/HLMhg
         O2dA==
X-Received: by 10.180.19.97 with SMTP id d1mr15441740wie.19.1406400145678;
        Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (cpc2-broo7-2-0-cust637.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.11.186.126])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m8sm27112538wjy.35.2014.07.26.11.42.25
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 19:42:20 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps
Message-ID: <20140726194220.5a2a81f8@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <slrnlt7t99.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de>
References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org>
	<53CD8BBA.2010605@gentoo.org>
	<slrnlt7dl6.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de>
	<20140726163242.389162b6@pomiot.lan>
	<slrnlt7i7m.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de>
	<20140726163923.6dd4da71@googlemail.com>
	<slrnlt7kf4.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de>
	<20140726171448.6bf23aed@googlemail.com>
	<slrnlt7t99.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 boundary="Sig_/wEC41LcdN.G03+t0LhUJqdL"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 621b8c33-ca29-4497-908f-847f987a5eb2
X-Archives-Hash: 2c7b6a7a0fcbc1cdfb8fa6eaacc80956

--Sig_/wEC41LcdN.G03+t0LhUJqdL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:36:27 +0000 (UTC)
Martin Vaeth <martin@mvath.de> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> > * Overlays
> >> Not an issue: Exactly the information of that ebuild
> >> which *would* be used if you reemerge contains
> >> the relevant data.
> >
> > The association between an installed package and "the ebuild it came
> > from" doesn't work correctly when overlays around.
>=20
> It doesn't have to: That ebuild which would be installed
> *has* to carry the up-to-date information for that package.
> Otherwise, the overlay is broken. An overlay is *not* a
> different slot for a package.

Uh huh, so you add an overlay, and suddenly the dependencies for a
random subset of your installed packages change in ways that don't in
any way reflect what you have installed. How is this the desired
behaviour?

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh

--Sig_/wEC41LcdN.G03+t0LhUJqdL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlPT9o8ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGndgCgkhhIIpEjssbF7cc14p1m4sHP
uLAAn3DTXPATfC+tlB2WwavOnOYlYWEe
=9vas
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/wEC41LcdN.G03+t0LhUJqdL--