From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFA313877A for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74397E0FC8; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0FDDE0FBC for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:32:17 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyz+57jTVMtVX7771jWiJc= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (95-130-165-192.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [95.130.165.192]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 35.2 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id V03f0eq6QGW2Tf3 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:32:02 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:31:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.21-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: William Hubbs References: <1406316517.20388.22.camel@gentoo.org> <20140726153904.GA13389@linux1> <20140726162011.GB13389@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20140726162011.GB13389@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3497677.8l1i2GzIvt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201407261832.01411.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 8fb5692c-aadd-4784-9186-b9f7664606b8 X-Archives-Hash: b1443f2e2ef1ab590035285d5bcb3833 --nextPart3497677.8l1i2GzIvt Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 18:20:11 schrieb William Hubbs: > I know I'm replying to my own message, but I do have a concern about > this that I want to ask about. >=20 > When a stable request is filed for a package, it is filed for all > architectures which have the ~arch keyword for the package and are > marked stable or dev in profiles.desc. >=20 > If an arch wants to stay marked stable or dev but only stabilize a > subset of packages, I think it is reasonable to drop that arch's > keywords from packages they decide not to stabilize rather than move the > keywords to ~arch. That makes it obvious that we shouldn't file stable > requests on that package for that arch. I'd say the decision should be made by the arch team, not by the package=20 maintainer.=20 Means, arch teams can drop keywors in packages, but normally stabilization= =20 goes ahead as usual and requests are filed. Whether they are then honoured = is=20 another question. =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart3497677.8l1i2GzIvt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0 iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJT09gBXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwNzlCRDk4QzA4RENBRkYzQUEwRjQzMDlF QkU2QTMzNkJFMTkwMzlDAAoJEOvmoza+GQOchMkP/R4R7noS+9Y7gVJZ72tQggtY gM47WAPdaq9wQHpZa+YbcPHRcW05yM9hdj/2Zy2W2zbB7HY80NrkxeAdEEKLTeOJ NUZ6/oe609PLjKAapb2/YPYReQwGnPabOmKuo9DemR5/ToXAyOyimOF1S8lq/Ve5 UKiK7igpxCg48qUeXXw4v6vOPCbo/Sm3KM62JlolwCqG7DonSrSan+zkPF7wVWbU 8uv4kdwUw6dY9KNpnPEZIg9MlY7yoxT6+hXWzXZp/Gt802IMB+q9ESmk5KyRAQre JjIoy6I5PlhrI0HNsDTPkJ/Y63X2DYP6V8A3KamcbRZcWmGzY+yezkqEOc63PT7k 0+/G3dZqWME+1s2SiEkFVjam6DWhRJ5VuOJ3iHyxUyKoaAixIa2eJ8bn4h5DjdwD j87dyxG6Icb8OpFD+peex7y5UNdo0F1/toPXVymv/ePzEMBrs2LTqEicMrYGBlZC iv8bcDA2s4tR7mj8in54dadYZKBJBr4Z7Da098hMBBvUqjlgy/205mOp6wMJWqMp Wo7nB+Nm/C6dIjD/TCRGGHizBHBB0D/x3VsC1vHvIaYqI3ptl1sMirNYS18sLf/O 4jSlj77TO3qaddvTOUO2JPT1MoIvuqum9oR3lR7INZEESda9fC3mSFTwKz1A/MOH l7ZrQ9rM0nGcIzTyI6Ok =ej3a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3497677.8l1i2GzIvt--