From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A56113877A for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:09:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67B3AE0E18; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76D15E0E03 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot.lan (77-254-85-187.adsl.inetia.pl [77.254.85.187]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 903AD34003C; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:09:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:09:16 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?B?TWljaGGzIEfzcm55?= To: Martin Vaeth Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps Message-ID: <20140726170916.1ce6d600@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <201407212153.04605.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20140721205527.142cb3d5@googlemail.com> <1405976767.1013.9.camel@gentoo.org> <20140725000627.34d08221@pomiot.lan> <20140726144613.2e3727e0@googlemail.com> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/rQ8VMai63bOhKolap/RwhZ6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: b058657d-df8c-4817-9b97-3e8fa92bd00a X-Archives-Hash: f00fcf42661ade3673d0df6d4b40b283 --Sig_/rQ8VMai63bOhKolap/RwhZ6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2014-07-26, o godz. 15:01:46 Martin Vaeth napisa=B3(a): > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Martin Vaeth wrote: > >> The idea is to act "as usual", just to skip unnecessary phases... > > > > So someone adds optional selinux support to a package, and then you end > > up with selinux being "on", despite not having it, and then another > > package depends upon your package with [selinux], and the dependency is > > mistakenly treated as met... >=20 > If the developer has added IUSE=3Dselinux and bumps from -r1 to -r1.1, > he has of course verified that this USE-change does not require > recompilation either way, since otherwise he would not have been > allowed to explicitly say the package manager that recompilation > is unnecessary. > So the dependency is *correctly* treated as met. Excuse me but are we talking about updating *DEPEND or IUSE? --=20 Best regards, Micha=B3 G=F3rny --Sig_/rQ8VMai63bOhKolap/RwhZ6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJT08ScXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZObvoP/jk93uXdQES8PSezXufHvnRH gQYbopREKQClW2jcK5IBCStGdjKbL5ihbVKpUWzcT4eSPoCfCsvwO3Htql3IWqq3 S/w2gag6YRdtZ6ULf2ap3wIMOOFMjKvJp/0iJ2rM49jFpiNOaeaJsnECL7+JIAwU Ph2Pf+hQa2NnDhuXpMdrRqzRk/tVwj/G1gn7P221/g4icEh7gAaIX9f/uOT1/5/s JeZJ1aFPcu3B2P9aPgwcVFKC88VUJQMuu0nMYkzAhGjGzj6ErGugKzCM1GmBfQja b3/0YjDqhxHA04hUHwFMvMF4G7uAU619Xt2xchtP5Rg6EIKVm5bALQehDoq0Xrp/ SU0DErhoR5gRwONBZI9l9MkjhbX6j0NvrEwah3rmm8x49WEfX0xwC9MWb+Q2mCT/ ldRtOGYmhGT4akv0majI7Zz76lBZCQrsr2/g6LEm7ipOvHnJ4BTB1VWA0YN0/Bjj dc2tpzxsjfAHncQMdR2F3F48h8I0Mi+unqkJteLBV4J8GqfmLyIujrSUG/W0RHUp 0ZL2yVsi9n92yAiYByKaWe/hd2LPI/kj9USWHzKpoFCOJIRDja9csVw+P3I2okPY aZFD7nHd7LcfhECQbtriaeGSXjs5YIJUc9VROec0WZobpMzQhbVImf2/QCeUo4c9 X9enmY1lupC/lP7sBl21 =0tEM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/rQ8VMai63bOhKolap/RwhZ6--