From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66926-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6104F13877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:22:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D41EFE0E29;
	Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:22:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com (mail-we0-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1F6DE0E09
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:22:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w61so5585654wes.9
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type;
        bh=ogOY3IIlAsupr+xiApsa0SB7SoGxK1kZWk/aIn1iTmY=;
        b=iRUFx+a/GsD5EHqR46NLtAvTBLHKAkz0eAApZl1xIT7gkeVKVYPOA/nd7Qg86YspUM
         DAfuVXgn0NRxU/u/rPfQVsiboKBO0uBA9E1TFtx9ALRS8DCbVDLCDWMXtKN48ItWUi5E
         9SW6sA7BXZl2szYQqR+KGzRXUF9fQ1AGx3z46cJcla+SX/+PBa9YoEn1cvs+V86xuGOk
         rZ5EShx3tqhH8ufWsmAORyLfot7K3U+jN63vPfFUWAJR/A00d2e0M0NPIddY3z5YsRh1
         uggM5UGWTaS6X87rsE/m6Gb+91kO6MZWlT81XB10tpRV050z5jYBPRUZfa89CKo6bWlf
         2mGQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.99.102 with SMTP id ep6mr14392943wib.1.1406388150359;
        Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (cpc2-broo7-2-0-cust637.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.11.186.126])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j6sm32059523wje.29.2014.07.26.08.22.29
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:22:25 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps
Message-ID: <20140726162225.021650eb@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <slrnlt7h97.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de>
References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org>
	<201407212153.04605.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
	<20140721205527.142cb3d5@googlemail.com>
	<1405976767.1013.9.camel@gentoo.org>
	<20140723143325.031947fb@googlemail.com>
	<slrnlt77uj.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de>
	<20140726134455.44cf518f@googlemail.com>
	<slrnlt7agr.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de>
	<20140726142023.7dc9e12b@googlemail.com>
	<slrnlt7fqg.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de>
	<20140726155454.7f7ad9f4@googlemail.com>
	<slrnlt7h97.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 boundary="Sig_/Og+cndp.7z+8oUaxCdHYiKR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 86dcc9cd-060c-4c7d-b0f7-e16a33d11152
X-Archives-Hash: ce376fbd87757cb8e857d8f1479a772d

--Sig_/Og+cndp.7z+8oUaxCdHYiKR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:11:36 +0000 (UTC)
Martin Vaeth <martin@mvath.de> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Martin Vaeth <martin@mvath.de> wrote:
> > The problems are of a different kind. Static dependencies don't do
> > something that you want them to do. Dynamic dependencies are
> > outright broken.
>=20
> Please, stop your childish behaviour.
> You prove nothing be repeating claims which had just been disproved.

Let's start with the easiest issue: please point us all to the place
where you "proved" how dynamic dependencies still work in the face of
ebuild removals. Your solution to this problem will be of great
benefit to all of us.

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh

--Sig_/Og+cndp.7z+8oUaxCdHYiKR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlPTx7MACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGl1gCgg9Lws4BYC+HHV5AkeU4fbVk+
+RoAn0dR2hXTzF+ycTGirxwZy4XZ1/ix
=rGyi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/Og+cndp.7z+8oUaxCdHYiKR--