From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:20:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140726162011.GB13389@linux1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140726153904.GA13389@linux1>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 633 bytes --]
I know I'm replying to my own message, but I do have a concern about
this that I want to ask about.
When a stable request is filed for a package, it is filed for all
architectures which have the ~arch keyword for the package and are
marked stable or dev in profiles.desc.
If an arch wants to stay marked stable or dev but only stabilize a
subset of packages, I think it is reasonable to drop that arch's
keywords from packages they decide not to stabilize rather than move the
keywords to ~arch. That makes it obvious that we shouldn't file stable
requests on that package for that arch.
What does everyone else think?
William
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-26 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-25 19:28 [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Pacho Ramos
2014-07-25 19:38 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-07-25 19:50 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-07-25 19:57 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-07-25 20:07 ` William Hubbs
2014-07-26 8:36 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-07-26 8:44 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-07-26 9:09 ` Johannes Huber
2014-07-26 11:57 ` Manuel Rüger
2014-07-26 11:59 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-07-26 12:16 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-07-26 10:22 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-07-26 11:36 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-07-26 11:47 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-07-26 11:56 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-07-26 12:23 ` Rich Freeman
2014-07-26 13:25 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-07-26 12:55 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-07-26 13:28 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-07-26 13:37 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-07-26 13:44 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-07-26 20:29 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-07-26 22:01 ` Pacho Ramos
2014-07-29 14:30 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-07-30 2:16 ` Jack Morgan
2014-07-30 10:26 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-07-30 21:18 ` Joseph Jezak
2014-07-30 23:44 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-07-31 0:21 ` Jack Morgan
2014-07-26 11:44 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-07-26 12:53 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-07-26 15:39 ` William Hubbs
2014-07-26 16:20 ` William Hubbs [this message]
2014-07-26 16:31 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-07-26 17:19 ` William Hubbs
2014-07-26 17:33 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Palimaka
2014-08-01 8:52 ` Raúl Porcel
2014-08-01 9:35 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-08-02 8:59 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-08-01 10:28 ` Duncan
2014-07-26 16:40 ` Michael Palimaka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140726162011.GB13389@linux1 \
--to=williamh@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox