From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C23513877A for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CD9DE0C7D; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 415BCE0C64 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:55:53 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyz+57jTVMtVX7771jWiJc= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (95-130-165-192.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [95.130.165.192]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 35.2 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id N01b4aq6QCtpLh2 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:55:51 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:55:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.21-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <1406316517.20388.22.camel@gentoo.org> <53D3955B.7000007@gentoo.org> <1406375762.20388.38.camel@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1406375762.20388.38.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1792239.bcNYuZ9XRs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201407261455.51134.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: a6248d73-7c45-4de7-9b0d-2f1cc19cda73 X-Archives-Hash: 42e34da753f5bd13344a41d8c77567f5 --nextPart1792239.bcNYuZ9XRs Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2014, 13:56:02 schrieb Pacho Ramos: > I guess we will need to wait for the next Council to officially decide > to do this as it will be a big change for ppc* users :/ (I remember > their action was needed for the move to testing of some arches and the > "package-by-package" proposal for others) >=20 > Also, I am not sure if any other arch teams (sparc, ia64?) would want to > get this policy too :| (I got ppc* because this concrete case ;)) At first this is an arch team decision. No need for the council. (Given that in this case there is a responsive and addressable arch team...) =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart1792239.bcNYuZ9XRs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0 iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJT06VXXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwNzlCRDk4QzA4RENBRkYzQUEwRjQzMDlF QkU2QTMzNkJFMTkwMzlDAAoJEOvmoza+GQOcxUgP+wRBzrKtWBeXIzHY7NRcZ1nN E+ErLFww9Wennk0Kf3aSz+I1DUMLG3IgJLjolHhr0It/5qvJmZ3NU2yzxxmS7j8w U7ErCiNTu9juZx7WW9jc8RUu/eTOcLkARNp7PskohDNIGmq3Q7EbyAkOUd26N3fl MlRA2eLKd5EAieq5hsxK7vpFYMwWzTNzsxR+Oniz5vLkXS3TzeJ8Ofqp2s2L3DNA cDc2iD5KbObYdnt1Ki3/dKTatxKYEZhPqDqPKdT57Wp4MJdD+fo5xhgUq/XTTvQG wY4F11KcPdKgTj8ARLRAGArvvcRRHxE5uiCvk1e68S0PT4Y5RnJF6c10hMrE5Ul/ t9bsvjxbvdDU89mCOfUtfWs254OAtks2zpRNqW0xyLi0/MxHt6gF7eouROLF29gF IEe2NfmRCNpniXJNhcBTDa+LCMF1Gyg+VzlriUKIcS0tUcQYQeQmgibNGc/PyQnH hfxo/sVDBhmGMv7HBISWSI0KSlv/9/0fTvdSEzNo4w8gntUZFoWJI3jVU+Tl+Q2f OGRFN5JqNDLcD7RzhzI3zv9SjYkrkwhKz/GDwdrjwjgKTQcxmk1Kjn1kCvyN0laE Tlc7rJMGNfaKmA+W4Z6JF+L65biTeQEeDsPa6Wk3nByhQMj8aocv9kAjwWx33Gue Sf0a0rmC90EGLgS8kjbA =abpF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1792239.bcNYuZ9XRs--