From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66888-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA2913877A
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:20:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E389E0B24;
Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:20:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52CD8E0A97
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:20:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so2291392wiv.17
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
:content-type;
bh=EjNqKz5PWc1Q7RtTTQD7y3l5E+Cd8I2DTzjzjYJDFDs=;
b=VWh+JFnDSfUZmuMzYuG1WWM5DR/FQUNCgM944ln/7WgoiuDppi1heKqttjVHkDkQaa
9w1t9n+XzzEz3d+ZO8yw7yHJdf/INRggbx2N3bLNkNUA0uARfI+B0VAxWzigU+ZWvQk1
n9zac4T5eB4Av6h9cYb4pfa11ivffehe+JNODiUufo89h93v6L+lHRORyH95y0c2n0mZ
rIkh64EE4POTJFdoS/SetTgg79M7I4XlmTfK71x9sOwrqZEjCVMr+oPP0rLyla+ac921
XBr5+l/Nn7CBwW501e7VwhgawbCY8yGC9D82SiZslMny25E2a632U0AetX2AGpjZj0xf
6grQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.38.14 with SMTP id c14mr13405568wik.43.1406380828916;
Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (cpc2-broo7-2-0-cust637.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.11.186.126])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f6sm33642405wja.25.2014.07.26.06.20.28
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:20:23 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps
Message-ID: <20140726142023.7dc9e12b@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <slrnlt7agr.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de>
References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org>
<201407212153.04605.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
<20140721205527.142cb3d5@googlemail.com>
<1405976767.1013.9.camel@gentoo.org>
<20140723143325.031947fb@googlemail.com>
<slrnlt77uj.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de>
<20140726134455.44cf518f@googlemail.com>
<slrnlt7agr.9i1.martin@epidot.math.uni-rostock.de>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
boundary="Sig_/k0riGhIGxqOHiOHbngF3ufa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 9236b6ae-9e11-41f9-901d-c55e9f9b588e
X-Archives-Hash: 161992eb06d5e3a3d111a376226d3953
--Sig_/k0riGhIGxqOHiOHbngF3ufa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 13:16:13 +0000 (UTC)
Martin Vaeth <martin@mvath.de> wrote:
> But, OK, so I will use your strawman to prove
> how static deps are broken:
This is not broken. This is exactly what is supposed to happen, and it
is exactly what *does* happen some of the time with dynamic
dependencies too.
--=20
Ciaran McCreesh
--Sig_/k0riGhIGxqOHiOHbngF3ufa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlPTqxoACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFGHwCg30PKFytZR5rbwYahnKkdFt2w
Y7IAn1y874xumnCpvPfoMLx9QCgdusL7
=GpGA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/k0riGhIGxqOHiOHbngF3ufa--