From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC5813877A for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D973E19F8; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wp260.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp260.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.133.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CE87E1971 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hsi-kbw-046-005-047-015.hsi8.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de ([46.5.47.15] helo=gentp.lnet); authenticated by wp260.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1XAknQ-0002aR-Ba; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:04:48 +0200 Received: from gentp.lnet (gentp.lnet [IPv6:::1]) by gentp.lnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC43C261B9E for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:04:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:04:38 +0200 From: Luis Ressel To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: USE flags in virtuals, to allow a specific provider to be determined Message-ID: <20140725210438.0703f164@gentp.lnet> In-Reply-To: <53D2A6C8.9060900@gentoo.org> References: <53D2A6C8.9060900@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/coAwR+FzrK1w0Q9BubO58YX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;aranea@aixah.de;1406315090;00a92577; X-Archives-Salt: fe03e0d4-1c77-4575-bab8-090834e9ca37 X-Archives-Hash: 21f0b9a5d63fb98e8e970f5a552d592e --Sig_/coAwR+FzrK1w0Q9BubO58YX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I guess that would solve some of the issues we've had with virtuals in the past. I support the idea, however, I'm not sure of the technical consequences it might have. I would leave the REQUIRED_USE out. It's a hassle to write, and if an user decides to set multiple use flags on such a virtual, why not just let him do it? Regards, Luis Ressel --Sig_/coAwR+FzrK1w0Q9BubO58YX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJT0qpHXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBMjU3MDBFQTc5QkYzMkY4NEQzMTFGNDlD NzE4OTFBNkEwRUZCN0U5AAoJEMcYkaag77fpcusP/0HO1fh+GgyV+A2LKAitCpiH HtNUQWIQNOiEbOPfC3v9UHnPD+G2lHiWOVMJqQIgWRnZZsgmHsPC5tVugv+ovQxJ oo/5j8fzV0y712fazfYKzeAay93YrSAA4tGdV0RdrE+QznDvs1obO5IzJcdWX/qj 74qknhDz/uc2XIgQIgQoWKlsYP9yFLu1lzdD2bHVffrvs1OgV9lut/v/E8mV+akE v234U6NNIb7LDqPOJ6L4I6KHNpmyJwcOXIoO44HmTcClsMj+y/mipjnedCsePbYe aH7ljtIBdTUOew9pg73mpTzO0XevxjaxvtjdmVxWKTPVKLQR+fT8uOY+nxNBllBg qihGLoVFjLuu0LqXaI+WSaYIgNQNaFibLXX0iNEWa1e7MEFTiYYhzHHXFJC5b2Ov tHEMTo5oglh4HDf4VH/e1If2cSo1TE6vIpeBCmzRrKn20Zk7zwh++r12eibmshla zwbO8F1esynNtssbS9NVILx18FLCgVOmqKAXoPmB0P2vr21DtCmT2ppulqmSK8Lm LeDZrMVGQx/08XHhKRDMKnZjg/zpoA3iD4jJK50HD/gsTJ7lB6t7xhca2ppr+QjT kSKrflNvg1lxqTgjmKoHg8Jzpna9mQpWLKZ/soUOc2T9I/wStP0b6z4ig4e91Nx8 3ALx1pHvRDnKjAssK9dn =M5Yg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/coAwR+FzrK1w0Q9BubO58YX--