From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986FC138A2F for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 01:32:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAF23E1465; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 01:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4F4CE13D5 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 01:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so188929wiv.17 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 18:31:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=0+3OUllwDTDhLPA1fN3HCHMktQ8uwa4m5zOpZRvpvc4=; b=X/zsxGMvBt+46wY1i8wvq5G0iPg6ys6XsX5YnQYL9ieTRjNkwQnjmL9wGpTV+jFDM9 ujIrYke35mPY7t6pmtBOCjhEvmI/Qd5Qin8pQoS80Z3pgSCeP+tb0gJZrw2TbO+qiwOP nUe/ENmuqKLCSjxGmarH7Vh6bb7Qty9yz4uKtYUItUR92nUwM6AvD6CL7da21SMu1gyI D4tGVUTZ2sQiIOyumkqqcyxUj/Co801j4ZnCVmHLVJXrdBMB21rEfLJyk1Ht1E8X2tCB ts60fQ6xs1t1VUNg92PVadWravW+yrGlopgvB2vaves1DNcW9Yx6L9uTYIYGNdm059rm tyXQ== X-Received: by 10.180.87.199 with SMTP id ba7mr3055118wib.49.1406122412668; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 06:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc2-broo7-2-0-cust637.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.11.186.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dj2sm9561334wib.11.2014.07.23.06.33.32 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Jul 2014 06:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:33:25 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Message-ID: <20140723143325.031947fb@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <1405976767.1013.9.camel@gentoo.org> References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <201407212153.04605.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20140721205527.142cb3d5@googlemail.com> <1405976767.1013.9.camel@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/eAD_y9hNPltJP0MNj4f9pK2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 830910e8-0d73-4184-b1f6-9217a50c4038 X-Archives-Hash: e481375204d0584a9f9df770f3765d7a --Sig_/eAD_y9hNPltJP0MNj4f9pK2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 23:06:07 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > Maybe this could be solved by having two kinds of revisions: > - One would rebuild all as usually (for example, -r1...) > - The other one would only regenerate VDB and wouldn't change the > installed files (for example, -r1.1) >=20 > But I am not sure if it could be viable from a "technical" point of > view :( This in no way solves the problem. Consider the following course of events: User installs foo-1.1-r1 Developer makes foo-1.1-r1.1 foo-1.1* is removed from the tree User syncs --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/eAD_y9hNPltJP0MNj4f9pK2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlPPuagACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGh7ACg3czq9vDxR4hW9NdvJ3s80RgO +iQAoJppbzTFI4FFZbyYutSBRr7F4CPM =FnkJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/eAD_y9hNPltJP0MNj4f9pK2--