From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530DD13877A for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5658CE0899; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from winston.telenet-ops.be (winston.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.75]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F67AE087D for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baptiste.telenet-ops.be (baptiste.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.51]) by winston.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C191BC779 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:32:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gentoo.org ([94.226.51.153]) by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id VbYg1o0043JKcCE01bYg29; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:32:40 +0200 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:32:37 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ssuominen@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Message-ID: <20140723013237.0f69064b@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53CEB612.8030804@gentoo.org> References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53CD8BBA.2010605@gentoo.org> <53CE11F9.8020700@gentoo.org> <53CEB612.8030804@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/SqIaPrUV5pY+mCH5QZcuCqP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 9ccabd84-2a6e-406d-b1a3-1faff60c10ac X-Archives-Hash: 0728d5ce9cd38c856c62946c23fd700c --Sig_/SqIaPrUV5pY+mCH5QZcuCqP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:05:54 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote: > Not before someone has implemented an alternative way to avoid useless > rebuilding. > The quality of the distribution doesn't improve by killing one of the > most important > features the package manager has. > The quality of the distribution improves by providing an alternative > with less problems. Those are apples with eggs; what you claim to be most important in itself also has problems as stated in this thread, it doesn't stop there as even beyond that it is a hack that deals with triggered problems. So, I don't think it is right to discuss replacing problems with problems. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/SqIaPrUV5pY+mCH5QZcuCqP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTzvSVAAoJEPWZc8roOL/QDgQH/0SC2T1Wx1kZk0z7Pg5QvyIc vAgPLiohhuzJEI9bCiiV+hcEo0nP2AMkmWX0Keoo/MP3tkADpNd1D3zCieAjqyXL eJ2eJN1X4l5m3lwsmHLHauhWuMJHvUfZRSee4Pc3LUsAa0jyaYFixxiqIqQxLfro /T0pmO7GsdqcSQdyqcHthOxuVALjkuhO1pMOldvBXXik3qvVUoDLRHKDuCA16qJJ gM3btYWXW2uPRNV/edhTunP1tz6WsCjKJWrH6tf8vG46Msw5ljn6ssmObHm8zYd8 ZL9gDva9h/atO7l8V69ksnOl9YSAZyymnniAFufhDxr3B/yZaMc+uScZp6nkBrc= =7Dpv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/SqIaPrUV5pY+mCH5QZcuCqP--