From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CD613877A for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70D6CE096F; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wilson.telenet-ops.be (wilson.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.42]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0314EE0895 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xavier.telenet-ops.be (xavier.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.52]) by wilson.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C66349FD for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:21:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gentoo.org ([94.226.51.153]) by xavier.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id VbMN1o00K3JKcCE01bMNWQ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:21:22 +0200 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:21:20 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: phajdan.jr@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Message-ID: <20140723012120.6e9b6127@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53CE11F9.8020700@gentoo.org> References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53CD8BBA.2010605@gentoo.org> <53CE11F9.8020700@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/aQyMGZPYLJwUYMt1Ym5+AhO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 768de887-ad06-408a-acdb-6b3164fa3de5 X-Archives-Hash: 0b45b99f725164cfad35f7d5216cd43d --Sig_/aQyMGZPYLJwUYMt1Ym5+AhO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:25:45 +0200 ""Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > One question: why for "Removal of a USE flag along with the relevant > dependencies" dynamic deps say "revbump + unnecessary rebuild"? What > would happen without the revbump? Assuming dynamic dependencies don't exist, another package would still depend on the USE flag in the vdb; the only way to force that USE flag dependency to go away is with an unnecessarily rebuilding rev bump, as without it it would complain that the USE flag doesn't exist. (We're talking about RDEPEND=3D"some/pkg[useflag]" --> RDEPEND=3D"some/pkg") --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/aQyMGZPYLJwUYMt1Ym5+AhO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTzvHwAAoJEPWZc8roOL/QSOoH/37jSRf0ooJPACSBokaEx9oZ 9xi3jWcAaretltXIZZ7BQX99qMbngKL0ztg9Z4K4C45RKqzicUcswPWVm7A72jl6 FYSW9zuiGGEh2sZ0oNUQXFu7PQDyMfUj8/msohUc7yUB2WSzmVTpOdRvtTZSu8XR V31MhW/52DeC/4+2mrtIKbHrmlXPfu5KRxLK7o+eHL4nY3E2ICnmlbK97zK0HJUQ iq1Jh+h//BZQKDmAy1+I5LeIchly3pMG/UzrfnzyRiIeHbjzNWA5nyFBHVCu8ma/ 7ZIeslgDcliKMjxmI3O5CPh2k/14DLFX468K8XXZWt/yBBfxu6lxOOKFgYCsAWo= =bBFB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/aQyMGZPYLJwUYMt1Ym5+AhO--