From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D0B13877A for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E800CE08CA; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wilson.telenet-ops.be (wilson.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.42]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D18E08BF for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baptiste.telenet-ops.be (baptiste.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.51]) by wilson.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B933C35ADA for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:22:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gentoo.org ([94.226.51.153]) by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id VaN51o0073JKcCE01aN5yt; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:22:05 +0200 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:22:03 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: mgorny@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Message-ID: <20140723002203.2ca704af@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20140722231137.0ad5e127@pomiot.lan> References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53CD6D1F.3030609@gentoo.org> <20140722231137.0ad5e127@pomiot.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/wUY.liI+HMOO8mrYmC1.dWJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 30b1a1cf-0bb1-4cf2-8551-e4e0d48ccf40 X-Archives-Hash: af7624a23f7bba96a051121d01dd2bdb --Sig_/wUY.liI+HMOO8mrYmC1.dWJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 23:11:37 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > [citation needed]. >=20 > In other words, please support such claims with evidence. Because > honestly I didn't see very much people complaining about unnecessary > rebuilds, except in this specific thread. >=20 > But I guess they're indeed a larger issue than, for example, portage > forcing wrong branches of || dependencies or other dependency > calculation errors that result in people being unable to update their > systems. But I don't really visit Forums often. [citation needed]. Actually, please try to go a step further and reproduce it; surprise! > If you ever happen to change EAPI in a stable ebuild without revbump, > please be kind enough to revoke your own commit rights. Thanks. So much revocations. Thanks. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/wUY.liI+HMOO8mrYmC1.dWJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTzuQLAAoJEPWZc8roOL/QRUYH/1528kAVjTH3RviG/0OYXevF tZzK1ZyoCLW6dPt9Ga3KScXiRXZesqTWXv3Twz/3IZWnVNMy5Boga3BExotEERNg bc3tOP0+9sBklHjBpO7q5UfvjEd7hf5zoCxVHKW2kUgDpKP3iehYLf7ssEUElmRR zOMRKvCo/hNqaCfanSIv+mMfvQzpXqsivnVcgg5oCwBYgy/GupJxHKHq/LAcWaLu zHSeagf/oDACcPOxNBmVf7v7qbR+XVIRtJVpy3gJjGlFAiSa1RI8yRwuq3gXQe0v 43UufsXTto9Zd64PZoEMPSTC8IY4luufksL7bbbKxgh9d76O6eULYB3XpPF9WIA= =4p8g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/wUY.liI+HMOO8mrYmC1.dWJ--