From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C451F13877A for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78905E0B94; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A112E0AEC for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot.lan (77-253-192-104.adsl.inetia.pl [77.253.192.104]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C07433FFA6; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 23:11:37 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?B?TWljaGGzIEfzcm55?= To: Samuli Suominen Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Message-ID: <20140722231137.0ad5e127@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <53CD6D1F.3030609@gentoo.org> References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53CD6D1F.3030609@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/4fv.smzvZ9+2AAvJvGq2kH/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 4a3406d6-48d0-4022-a30d-22a1818b94bc X-Archives-Hash: 7349b27d130e37033862936e05c15300 --Sig_/4fv.smzvZ9+2AAvJvGq2kH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2014-07-21, o godz. 22:42:23 Samuli Suominen napisa=B3(a): > So, -1, useless rebuilds is one of the biggest problems lately, [citation needed]. In other words, please support such claims with evidence. Because honestly I didn't see very much people complaining about unnecessary rebuilds, except in this specific thread. But I guess they're indeed a larger issue than, for example, portage forcing wrong branches of || dependencies or other dependency calculation errors that result in people being unable to update their systems. But I don't really visit Forums often. > it's an > relatively new problem, > people are revbumping packages for the simplest things like EAPI4->5 If you ever happen to change EAPI in a stable ebuild without revbump, please be kind enough to revoke your own commit rights. Thanks. --=20 Best regards, Micha=B3 G=F3rny --Sig_/4fv.smzvZ9+2AAvJvGq2kH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTztOJXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOkjkP/0BerrZg3YcM5P9iYx92QeCr CJ3MV//81FVYpXpyR0WWLOq2eYWOUSUdCLmJebphXLQbhG0rTeim/MJR0RVZDLBP +WPXa/iu6uMCk/Ndgui4YUfZXP+GLof9sbwHqZew3xCXryxODx6otgukPxHEPKAx 784Kfc1qyuRW9Q6DA+N4wJh9tqupnG1un4sUM5WEgdD0NRuYGES7Y9qalHiakRJ6 s+vOKe/RTWtF0bveofn3gVn7TjCjS44VuATvH+GH/6FjsLXlgruXFkIEnYHNjZp/ 6i9+66yOBgwd7W8lI6SS/Yki3x9WZL8wveaSxGOlgUSKD8qV8P3fB/Ps7kOmeeah HnUGxl+QMuTghq485nNCNum/3BcnYHFL3DtDx9LU4Vb9ZB7CrwOQJJLTmxsmPyDQ QI5ZVxrh8t5ZI86bsqOCqQhWJial9l3Ei0kOTRLnlkaFU7u+8t3o5ZCD+afN1DWn 0r0yRACPobkitVK3bM8uGmQEQ+LBExg5WzKWXc3kIUabX2sE2KFYTFe7PBwPDUme KiARqHtbjXS2qiEcL/BHfBApaYGxdg4uVXWnrHppSc1ysw+CdrCIECvh3/o2zMK6 cN5S9ieCeWzcOHPbkWYz6XIjEqx4I9q09jQA8yc7MOl+f+diF+Ot5gGU4N+7VAzw 2CURyIiDDHl/vS2Wn+Nc =j2jt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/4fv.smzvZ9+2AAvJvGq2kH/--