From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66763-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0EF13877A
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:42:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21281E0D2E;
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:42:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-f50.google.com (mail-oa0-f50.google.com [209.85.219.50])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40D6DE0C0A
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:42:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id g18so218644oah.9
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
:user-agent;
bh=pRM5wu6nwN0NVsBezCrJhI0NEwUErMtdPhH6iZI0Yn8=;
b=ONE59qVu/+7uacdB3tLZhnTRsx4Kp+HF3dUy2ONOfj5J8/cbnZFhSDgrpSZHZBh9Ve
5T9uPaLwu+09HKTJ6sUqqGBWgjEGuSHz4ceW/W9Q2+Yv4puSZnWdrWUvtGKSH50n+7S4
ZoGhvcDBxF2Cb7xqRal/+oTosX2PVA++AbDMhtAOAWn9SJa3zlF6tsOr68j0LNXAbiLK
9PjDnrZ0q5oFBm//hr6Es9M/hK2cd3C3ZeqhoCVC/hspvEj7kq/SwOWBeXtbLJWCYirB
FJ1UXtfcv/3O1U7fhdfoH044SmmGiTBPDmpj2u7gw6fkLpGgAGa1O0gmkMATuXaKFSqT
9rVw==
X-Received: by 10.182.158.68 with SMTP id ws4mr29854953obb.86.1406058171491;
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jr2sm106045obb.8.2014.07.22.12.42.49
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: (nullmailer pid 27600 invoked by uid 1000);
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:42:43 -0000
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:42:43 -0500
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps
Message-ID: <20140722194243.GA27500@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org>
<201407212153.04605.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
<20140721225642.56aee8ed@pomiot.lan>
<53CD8269.3050808@gentoo.org>
<20140721225251.GA22854@linux1>
<53CDB213.6040502@gentoo.org>
<53CE3206.8040505@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53CE3206.8040505@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Archives-Salt: 9f7c4bee-8535-4cff-b5c9-07cd156daa06
X-Archives-Hash: 3ee2806b847e9718de07b336ab770d36
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:42:30AM +0200, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>=20
> On 22/07/14 02:36, hasufell wrote:
> > William Hubbs:
> >> My concern about doing a revbump just because the deps change is
> >> that the new revision has to be committed in ~arch, so we then
> >> have to hit the arch teams, which we know are overworked anyway,
> >> with stable requests just because we changed the dependencies.
> >> Isn't that causing a lot of possibly unnecessary work for our
> >> arch teams?
> > Procedure over logic?
> >=20
> > Just commit it straight to arch if repoman doesn't complain.
> William,
>=20
> this is, as Julian pointed out, a problem you can solve by changing
> your policies. This is not a problem related to the Portage software,
> in which dynamic-deps are broken.
s/your/our/
Repoman refuses to commit if you try to go directly to stable without
using --force.
I'm just being cautious; I'm not sure whether this qualifies as the type
of emergency situation where commiting directly to stable is a good
thing or not.
William
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlPOvrMACgkQblQW9DDEZTi9qACfXk3r6fS6FwFg1oZ41Zp/Psr1
ooUAn02cw7H0m2l8Ya/PEfpeCxppYk4y
=ue8o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--