From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C92213877A for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FC0DE0BBE; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3585CE0B92 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from marga.jer-c2.orkz.net (D4B2706A.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [212.178.112.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jer) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C12A033FE25 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 23:13:06 +0200 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Message-ID: <20140721231306.4fe9fb78@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <20140721220608.0dc344e1@googlemail.com> References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53CD6D1F.3030609@gentoo.org> <53CD77E8.705@gentoo.org> <20140721230158.3ee7e0d9@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20140721220608.0dc344e1@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a4c1d5db-bf54-4ad0-8b19-c141e675422e X-Archives-Hash: b414bd9cbbd94c09831d41343cf61283 On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:06:08 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 23:01:58 +0200 > Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > So you suggest we work around a bug in the PM which would be a > > single fix. Everywhere. > > Dynamic dependencies is not fixable. It's an irredeemably broken > concept. It works fine for me. jer