From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66731-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD94C13877A
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:53:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A47D3E0C57;
Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:52:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-f41.google.com (mail-oa0-f41.google.com [209.85.219.41])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1F67E0C0B
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:52:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id j17so8585364oag.0
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
:user-agent;
bh=+totXmnjFA2ywpbUAnNO9FrJZIxMZTvxmwLg031f5Vo=;
b=zNPrJumxXkW/BHeOe3WOCCLsrTZ7/2nXx3XOLoNm86Wk8d3QrftaQ4hjlNZJn/05fS
AfAb6C/H31CiQfYp5BWO2/fKMXpNBtDObSOaM2s/YkmtqHq3kCiMILVvuKYMKmkcoTrX
CUWX46GjQc5ru7aSjYEGvD0XGBgIgMF7DR5uB6+YYEuHFb1ZVDkSP3jsm1BorcP0L6up
y22djNso7TqWjT6vzC1kNkXzP1VanOcwoGxiPkYAyvR32VF1+zD0gzRdpOUL42kFDGtZ
8jWdSmgui9JNNiaLjBkAxXBFQRGXGv9WCxMCH+Hr5TyUI1ZLxPPGtCav2roRRVCDY/yJ
xS1A==
X-Received: by 10.182.102.197 with SMTP id fq5mr41348496obb.3.1405983174918;
Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r4sm30913320obi.3.2014.07.21.15.52.52
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: (nullmailer pid 23116 invoked by uid 1000);
Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:52:51 -0000
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:52:51 -0500
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps
Message-ID: <20140721225251.GA22854@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org>
<201407212153.04605.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
<20140721225642.56aee8ed@pomiot.lan>
<53CD8269.3050808@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53CD8269.3050808@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Archives-Salt: 6ea84b26-e696-4bfe-8d90-f61e2e78a5c6
X-Archives-Hash: 08be9c14c51404d3c95f3bec7364f172
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
I'm picking a random msg to reply to.
My concern about doing a revbump just because the deps change is that
the new revision has to be committed in ~arch, so we then have to hit
the arch teams, which we know are overworked anyway, with stable
requests just because we changed the dependencies. Isn't that causing a
lot of possibly unnecessary work for our arch teams?
William
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlPNmcMACgkQblQW9DDEZTiQiwCfTwEdwE61te9F2E38aLBqXsIv
eLwAn2ebslAC6fb97MSMQELdp3h953eO
=oYxn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--