From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B77D13877A for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 19:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9AA7E098A; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 19:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B525EE0953 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 19:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hi2so4657838wib.17 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:50:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=s1nrLSFG9znjhnY5MjQZ96nE2MxtNOVWiMDznNpF5Zs=; b=wFut1L5aiKJscsjHVbTotJxDQi6c5c/eOCW3a0xwz0jJRNVDdzaFOqwuXnlxD+FoHG YMeHl9/MMImoGifjOu5GCdGb2dNIy3TrP2ZTzLtcI8XTXYe4nagMbriUw51frv7ZsBsI CPfmN1XZd8I+wu2WDpJ6yBSYDx+M87eqf2aLxrCBfKveISN3umh3LCPgffWc95RG+T1B 0ShcHyhqLaEqDymITUdDLlYE8EEvH72SCOwNX/aIkbOUlfClxX+z3DJ1RV7R8hLY9ryU UqWaLP9X0riFl9hwI203JY78jOgIZLxuO41oNTWhUwl7nHCaZATv/05Ez0tsYf8eQS97 0SeA== X-Received: by 10.180.221.135 with SMTP id qe7mr7485213wic.17.1405972247297; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc2-broo7-2-0-cust637.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.11.186.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w9sm45318574wif.12.2014.07.21.12.50.46 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:50:41 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Message-ID: <20140721205041.185f2a85@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <53CD6D1F.3030609@gentoo.org> References: <53CD6BED.10603@gentoo.org> <53CD6D1F.3030609@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/vlY9PEofUv2.hQEDIxQYyMa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: ad9b2409-0611-4b07-84a3-d1904c980d34 X-Archives-Hash: 3e563bf6c911a4cb94b6ac7044928b47 --Sig_/vlY9PEofUv2.hQEDIxQYyMa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:42:23 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote: > people are revbumping packages for the simplest things like EAPI4->5 EAPI changing to 5 should always get a revbump, since it causes confusion if anyone has a USE dependency upon your package. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/vlY9PEofUv2.hQEDIxQYyMa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlPNbxUACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHTRACdECCi+3DkZ3GAK7dUdN19/3S5 q8wAoJRGTFRlWTkpKa7E35K2pypsv4mj =kKAw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/vlY9PEofUv2.hQEDIxQYyMa--