From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A4313877A for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 21:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A66E9E0809; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 21:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8439FE07A7 for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 21:08:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FCB20E7E for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 17:08:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 05 Jul 2014 17:08:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=aZPQnZZ4zQ+j1b0ZOiYedxlUrFQ=; b=Q4xOJHtyvdyFeOUVuDT9m45C0X6G xiJuPg+oTZdEifZHOyB0JmJ+o2ra/jX6PGxk33BJ7m1mifNMOXTYmisz/u642B5f ebcbaaLuarXjbUpKKU3ua/6zTk8B4XiGjnpJJyKakEwCYTZH1pM7UTNC3wFeGQrn gSHQsgEbfcn/Rko= X-Sasl-enc: PJfzPDakLMCR3X//ApBp/UPoDGd1+vC2qMl9G7fbo59o 1404594485 Received: from localhost (unknown [76.28.255.20]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BC9306800F8; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 17:08:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 14:08:04 -0700 From: Greg KH To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask vs ~arch Message-ID: <20140705210804.GA4133@kroah.com> References: <20140630040153.GA668@linux1> <20140630161555.15ab3403@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140630161555.15ab3403@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Archives-Salt: dd4e1d0b-505c-45cd-b04a-e9fa14dbbef1 X-Archives-Hash: a95871d6e72bd65e9f2dc7523c3c16cd On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 04:15:55PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:25:27 -0400 > Rich Freeman wrote: > > > Agree 100%. I'm taking about masking things that HAVEN'T BEEN TESTED > > AT ALL. The maintainer knows that they compile, and that is it. > > Developers who "HAVEN'T [...] TESTED AT ALL" and still commit their > changes to the tree should immediately hand in their toys and leave > the project. What toys? Were we given some when we became developers? If I had some I'd send mine back in, but as I don't, I'll keep committing stable kernel ebuilds that I never test as no one seems to be complaining... greg "never make absolute statements" k-h