From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66408-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA2213877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:56:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1F3EE089F;
	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:55:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D438DE076B
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:55:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from marga.jer-c2.orkz.net (D4B2706A.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [212.178.112.106])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: jer)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 387B234033F
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:55:26 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:55:21 +0200
From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask vs ~arch
Message-ID: <20140630185521.37cbd2dd@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_=mVZxiQyG-kZD7VJuPTtxaJcjAbVA3F3dpa2UZ35HfOQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140630040153.GA668@linux1>
	<CAGfcS_mHOeQb-S3Tcfz4MYdJ9vwjFamVxqNQGxiEB1+4+YYoGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<53B1809F.9070807@gentoo.org>
	<20140630173654.0c70c367@pomiot.lan>
	<53B184E3.5040902@gentoo.org>
	<20140630181345.702381e2@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net>
	<CAGfcS_=mVZxiQyG-kZD7VJuPTtxaJcjAbVA3F3dpa2UZ35HfOQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 27464a99-df8f-4f00-b8f3-14eaaae1e48b
X-Archives-Hash: 055c22a779a70c5bc98bf4a619d373b8

On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:40:59 -0400
Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:

> I'm perfectly fine with the suggestion of requiring a bug reference
> when masking for testing.  I think that adds value.

You don't mean a reference to a bug report that merely says "masked for
testing" or purports to be a "tracker" (but isn't), right?


     jer