From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE84F13877A for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 550D5E094E; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 614DCE0918 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:16:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from marga.jer-c2.orkz.net (D4B2706A.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [212.178.112.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jer) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEA4E3400C1 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:15:55 +0200 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask vs ~arch Message-ID: <20140630161555.15ab3403@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20140630040153.GA668@linux1> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d019bc72-f1ac-4c74-8255-8cc8c0fcb29a X-Archives-Hash: e82928bb7501213bcf50fde875a9a845 On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:25:27 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > Agree 100%. I'm taking about masking things that HAVEN'T BEEN TESTED > AT ALL. The maintainer knows that they compile, and that is it. Developers who "HAVEN'T [...] TESTED AT ALL" and still commit their changes to the tree should immediately hand in their toys and leave the project. jer