From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3082A13877A for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 03:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E814E0AE1; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 03:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ACF5E0888 for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 03:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A1D21539 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 23:46:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 28 Jun 2014 23:46:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=Oe8Umt/AiFMwDAF1BryeSqXlPSQ=; b=CtpVG1wG+CHa4SrnU7IvVVV/Eiat McxnwVAK9SrU+5MEqBeBmfqDI2qq+Px8RXeepXsae9HUIJCerMQD1aSgv8aShP28 73Pa7Kd4twewM1z00xUJzJiN2aSsDpBv68VFOsjJArrSmcKJ+vmZwif+zYH0RSI7 lfUFPrBgizDSvlc= X-Sasl-enc: JY04ESkF3OzlkXRjpAUpJF9eh6KhQmTKV4BmkeJEc90y 1404013581 Received: from localhost (unknown [76.28.255.20]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6E9DB68015B; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 23:46:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:46:08 -0700 From: Greg KH To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Docker 1.0.0 masked for no known reason? Message-ID: <20140629034608.GA26508@kroah.com> References: <20140629025822.GB22414@kroah.com> <20140629051736.0173fd6b@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140629051736.0173fd6b@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Archives-Salt: 3a230d18-deb0-4b19-a06e-80accaf6793e X-Archives-Hash: f2629ebe081c6aa9de90596517c999c2 On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 05:17:36AM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 19:58:22 -0700 > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > Hi Markos, > > > > I was wondering why docker 1.0.0 wasn't seeming to get updated on my > > boxes recently, despite me commiting the update to the cvs tree, and > > Tianon noticed that it was masked at the moment: > > > > # Markos Chandras (03 May 2014) > > # Masked for further testing > > Oh, that good old "masked for testing", which actually never works. Exactly. > If you want testing to be done, you don't mask stuff. Also, no bug > number referenced. All you get is someone's e-mail address. So, given a total lack of "testing" by anyone, I might as well just remove the mask, so it can actually be done given that people are wanting the latest Docker release, especially due to the security fixes in it over the one that is currently not masked... thanks, greg k-h