From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B16C13877A for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 19:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD281E0ECF; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 19:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1FA7E0E6C for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 19:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from marga.jer-c2.orkz.net (D4B2706A.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [212.178.112.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jer) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A389533FD30 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 19:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:42:57 +0200 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: crossdev and multilib interference Message-ID: <20140616214257.096c93fc@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <539F462E.6050905@gentoo.org> References: <53208139.2040509@gentoo.org> <1660834.UE1ARX9orZ@vapier> <20140327084108.GA3654@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <31757180.gTPZtqku3h@vapier> <20140330095348.GA18419@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <539E03A9.3010109@gentoo.org> <539E0563.3080302@gentoo.org> <539EF323.7020208@gentoo.org> <1402944163.8309.2.camel@oswin.hackershack.net> <539F462E.6050905@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e3b34ac3-86ff-4a62-8d2a-715cf5c8362d X-Archives-Hash: 45ffed68300195a638035d839d77f151 On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 19:31:58 +0000 hasufell wrote: > Also check the history of this thread for a few proposed solutions. The history of this thread and the history of gx86-multilib and crossdev development suggest that crossdev was doing nothing wrong until gx86-multilib came around and a problem was found between them. Masking either for the benefit of the other would be, and let me quote the history of this thread out of context just to fit in with the tone and mode this sub-thread has taken, "asinine". jer