From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545D513877A for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 225ECE0B32; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:19:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C4F2E0B22 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:19:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id q58so4036929wes.16 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:19:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=jo4phv+Zi+UfF5kkhXWOosyqCdeWki1wl8S6cvX4+O8=; b=yG2BadJOcZqEaqBAa1gnHkdDde3zHpx7rYfiI5WAqGkt0CWYxrpaVTZTeo+rbQqjta SKXvcAZ9qFS7HPcj+ZwoQC04owNVnNFpqK0A12tmqSchUoySHV6zqxbMvw7KMORJht4p JnQPDoHGcsA+QRe/dcIUjxqQyddQtvZn4dcL2vdTegW3qRyrQjfoGtSXM3EEzkXkhcFE iMFLK/VVm7N9N/B/PW7DTy1Iumq6WMHsc0A/ZtN8cVXF4e+ZgVUmKWpKBwhmc4nst5EO oZeMXmvnS/mUV76ed4EDOKqNJBTZ8cQwXLspbmVFyUpoWtbUxt045/Nn/AFiIscz8njQ ExHQ== X-Received: by 10.194.122.169 with SMTP id lt9mr13769175wjb.16.1402762776851; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc2-broo7-2-0-cust637.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.11.186.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vp5sm10528996wjc.31.2014.06.14.09.19.36 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 17:19:31 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? Message-ID: <20140614171931.7cfc3f86@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <539C7554.4060703@gentoo.org> References: <20140614164151.45afb5ca@pomiot.lan> <20140614161341.6cc4c2fa@googlemail.com> <539C6B28.901@gentoo.org> <20140614164538.09a82da0@googlemail.com> <539C7554.4060703@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/P8s/lGj3cKa44_APTWfV8vN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a4efab68-06a1-4160-91d0-48194cd9ae66 X-Archives-Hash: 5cce8092d07d42e139540e66612fd319 --Sig_/P8s/lGj3cKa44_APTWfV8vN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:16:20 +0000 hasufell wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh: > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:32:56 +0000 > > hasufell wrote: > >> Ciaran McCreesh: > >>> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:41:51 +0200 > >>> Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > >>>> However, this means that we force much more rebuilds than > >>>> necessary. > >>> > >>> This shouldn't be considered to be a problem. > >> > >> Why not? > >=20 > > If "not having to do lots of compiling" is your goal, you're using > > the wrong distribution. > >=20 >=20 > I cannot see an argument against avoiding useless rebuilds here. They're not useless: they result in a change to VDB. That's all that matters, as can be seen by Gentoo not supporting partial rebuilds for revbumps where only a small text file is changed. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/P8s/lGj3cKa44_APTWfV8vN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlOcdhYACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEbHACgpbwxgUEWvysyr5LqcI464oXr zY0AoKz7aLku9weJLmxMgZIUngkGtjUG =ogjb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/P8s/lGj3cKa44_APTWfV8vN--