From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66202-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D43113877A
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:57:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7D4AE0AD5;
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:56:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com (mail-we0-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95281E0ACD
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:56:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x48so3285548wes.9
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
:content-type;
bh=7X74hPFDUAQ/OKgCIEVo9358glkH3kBl/GiU55OluUQ=;
b=mlv3KRBESZA9t9rKom0Oya/duF3Bf3rit8MjbHCRg/1Efgz6MDo0vLNDo7eihjGcQL
mA4xX6Zn8v2mly8aQvSHLMN5gpg5z8XxWUuygvOADfOz4tsSynJ1cEXBdEqfZbXmVXZw
2K3cdVYJCWm7fdD0gsv+mTP5JKxuIgyCqxBOhzY1Y8lI0XWOJ4DeNRxtFCB1oxdTDSEy
YnoIz8bTzqyWeJnj0h6ZJxaNR9rBaBhvdTwe54/4ECTmI0dKPkDQ3IDAoXHzEgqUcUCB
n7CS9Y3T5FpVeC6OdU5/OagbHvPBSCrWTmHvdR9XqnLl1S6pyRI9le/oJDtq0Z6/CivI
UgJg==
X-Received: by 10.194.48.38 with SMTP id i6mr9429688wjn.46.1402761417399;
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (cpc2-broo7-2-0-cust637.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.11.186.126])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wp2sm10306501wjb.29.2014.06.14.08.56.57
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:56:52 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on
any ABI changes?
Message-ID: <20140614165652.046552aa@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1402761029.16949.1.camel@rook>
References: <20140614164151.45afb5ca@pomiot.lan>
<20140614161341.6cc4c2fa@googlemail.com>
<1402761029.16949.1.camel@rook>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
boundary="Sig_/J_VJQK18Z9Vnlsv/zh8eVX4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: e97e0067-ce81-4d8f-b09a-77ed65c0c943
X-Archives-Hash: b9ed120593d6abafcd3cb86002fa76e7
--Sig_/J_VJQK18Z9Vnlsv/zh8eVX4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:50:29 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 16:13 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:41:51 +0200
> > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > However, this means that we force much more rebuilds than
> > > necessary.
> >=20
> > This shouldn't be considered to be a problem.
>=20
> This would be suicide for Gentoo as a distro. Organizations that have
> a dedicated build server and a standardized /etc/portage config tree
> pushed to all user machines could rebuild half of @world once a week.
> Individual users running Gentoo on a single workstation or server
> can't and won't.
Then either Gentoo should ship binary packages, or the user should find
another distribution.
Gentoo *already* does a full rebuild for packages whose bumps or
revbumps just result in one text file changing. So long as there isn't
a mechanism and full ebuild support in place to prevent this, it's a
silly argument.
--=20
Ciaran McCreesh
--Sig_/J_VJQK18Z9Vnlsv/zh8eVX4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlOccMcACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHlFwCg5QxHlcv29filuiK6rFPTuZb/
n5QAn2rB8pdN83+GSBFkxZ3GPxG2vTOK
=KVy3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/J_VJQK18Z9Vnlsv/zh8eVX4--