From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BBF13877A for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF6FBE0ACD; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C421DE0985 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:45:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q59so3885594wes.26 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:45:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=CdMoJc2zjQ2WPtGtF9uvgvySSLliavOPXvwwMEzl0OY=; b=BXmov4qQaO4sVrNWCqc7Iyh4Nu8bg4UxlS6o+zt/sr93aJqPdkWRNepEKmrTsynq5e BV6w03tTv3XccZ8tGUxoXtM0VcUREeKTOtZVAv9Vvu95i2l1r+r0Gd4lEN23y46ZDT8R 4c3bjMN/FVAKv/YAhfZq2VMzGVs5zJg4qJbadG6SZjBCyMaYLqIL3Od/t2/KdMewBkca J5daXqJnjL+Sz3+xDWyLTMYuwxP7wdZuFMen4797UfbHei0kzYVd+m0LejG7voJenQru HSoRtkZUr51HQfylRzlTo2vzQGlLug2ZKdiyDHnW1hnx7i5hl3/hu9EmiY0WQgmVTKWS Zt5g== X-Received: by 10.180.198.178 with SMTP id jd18mr13538797wic.24.1402760744643; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc2-broo7-2-0-cust637.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.11.186.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u10sm3401755wix.11.2014.06.14.08.45.44 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:45:38 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? Message-ID: <20140614164538.09a82da0@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <539C6B28.901@gentoo.org> References: <20140614164151.45afb5ca@pomiot.lan> <20140614161341.6cc4c2fa@googlemail.com> <539C6B28.901@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/h.CBnZGmdHEtBt5.Z0_8pzU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 77e63c94-f09d-49b0-b191-f219bf5faf9b X-Archives-Hash: c7bda5061c73d55531baf5fa87d0d566 --Sig_/h.CBnZGmdHEtBt5.Z0_8pzU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:32:56 +0000 hasufell wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh: > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:41:51 +0200 > > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > >> However, this means that we force much more rebuilds than > >> necessary. > >=20 > > This shouldn't be considered to be a problem. >=20 > Why not? If "not having to do lots of compiling" is your goal, you're using the wrong distribution. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/h.CBnZGmdHEtBt5.Z0_8pzU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlOcbiYACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHBXQCgq1sDaYhRz/Fus00i17yW0l9r OYcAoJh4AVBt8G2vD3BX773omRG4Gv8M =Y/NJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/h.CBnZGmdHEtBt5.Z0_8pzU--