From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8900413877A for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36779E0AA4; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19548E0A92 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id n12so3770319wgh.31 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:13:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=SrYe1QxebtFPpc3VpLesdoJFY53XaGeCh3AXIRvE1cA=; b=TJaRiZxFOlbcDJvbbm6Ph8oujcQAt341Agz9CANZRPOhsa1uOe/cwRLBkxSROcFCRU 7HC1LK2990nAJVyCFyIny4Rq748Y8tEDh5+6aAWXwt2YQeIzKLidGSETcXrGv9NQpl2b zERuDK5WkJnzl1WEM+Ncosyd3d16FZSfMSQZWEUW8LCssKN9ZUhrU7Q4AQZz8i8Yz58o T6rMybZA7CvNm27ErLjH6pvQl+6AZxTwR3rckhohwWkNtz1Hx2wu8xVubFHYS8XS7RcK bdF44fuuwqU2IYFNtFmU4+FzH+/xNH2i5DRH7NitmqDP0e6QHzhTwHdiiVLv3SPa1Dm8 cCYg== X-Received: by 10.194.77.39 with SMTP id p7mr3840835wjw.85.1402758829821; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc2-broo7-2-0-cust637.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.11.186.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ds9sm3248959wib.20.2014.06.14.08.13.49 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:13:41 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes? Message-ID: <20140614161341.6cc4c2fa@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140614164151.45afb5ca@pomiot.lan> References: <20140614164151.45afb5ca@pomiot.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/pCKSXt7WYKQfAXcWMHYiTlo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 437cc678-2e09-431f-94fe-572a97d294c4 X-Archives-Hash: e0b05a27e20cb5c3b762580e8d0d3262 --Sig_/pCKSXt7WYKQfAXcWMHYiTlo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:41:51 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > However, this means that we force much more rebuilds than necessary. This shouldn't be considered to be a problem. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/pCKSXt7WYKQfAXcWMHYiTlo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlOcZqsACgkQ96zL6DUtXhF0cwCg1fH/I07iQqjapyLzWGAxINRz 4cIAnig3ABgYoR2wbgn++/uu/60dNVJp =5bTr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/pCKSXt7WYKQfAXcWMHYiTlo--