From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66186-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86BE1387FD
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 05:44:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14DADE08BF;
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 05:44:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03105E081C
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 05:44:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A3C3403AA
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 05:44:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.007
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5
tests=[AWL=-0.354, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id S8lJ5XyUWHX4 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 05:44:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C3C93403A4
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 05:44:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-dev@m.gmane.org>)
id 1WvKHd-0006LY-VP
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 07:44:13 +0200
Received: from 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca ([71.17.69.121])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 07:44:13 +0200
Received: from rhill by 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 07:44:13 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Ryan Hill <rhill@gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:43:55 -0600
Organization: Gentoo
Message-ID: <20140612234355.72ef01c1@caribou.gateway.pace.com>
References: <20140609181602.7e843747@caribou.gateway.pace.com>
<20140610214750.11e599b3@caribou.gateway.pace.com>
<20140611152315.423dfdfa@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
boundary="Sig_/DrL_jJQTPg=dPg8+1Zt9lTt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
X-Archives-Salt: 27b93038-f1ff-450e-a6ba-76237e0cacef
X-Archives-Hash: a14d22b8918595e80213eb114dee6f44
--Sig_/DrL_jJQTPg=dPg8+1Zt9lTt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:23:15 +0200
Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Will bug #332823 and its ilk somehow be mitigated? Emerging glibc with
> -fstack-protector still leads to similar problems. There doesn't
> currently seem to be a bug report about this that isn't marked INVALID.
Bugzilla seems to be down so I can't look up the bug, but I doubt it's a
problem since you can't build glibc with -fstack-protector.
glibc/files/eblits/common.eblit:
gcc-specs-ssp && append-cflags $(test-flags-CC -fno-stack-protector)
Previously this was also dependent on `use hardened` so whatever that bug is
about it probably doesn't apply any more.
I've been running the ssp patches here for the last six months and have reb=
uilt
world a few dozen times with both 4.8 and 4.9 and haven't run into any
problems. That doesn't mean there aren't any, but that's why we added 4.8.=
2-r1
half a year ago so people could test it. Did anyone actually try it out? I
honestly want to know - if no one is testing masked versions then there's no
point keeping them masked for as long as I usually do.
--=20
Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org
47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463
--Sig_/DrL_jJQTPg=dPg8+1Zt9lTt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTmo+fAAoJEO04vUmVeoRjS08H/jAUIV/cJ7nV1/x0W9TM3wlR
MmC0Czgv4qCLewFrSHd/gfdPrqhPsJvkHv2r20bZwE8DIA99Njg79cmlOksWPP2t
OrFyC7eTD7u1Qtjx4rcLJjkE4Tl92aONatk/e9nYyIsfHuuE3o+/pMgvmSUrfUUo
El58X4FMdnoX5M2V+RHC0BZlixDBeQSvJNumP/gIT4Ma/0DzOUikDNhEex1OwSRI
9GhJTJKgru+HSbCi0KmTYzi0oRMH4YiR1DBTdkbBXOrYQnT/coVhJJtCnwv4AZOi
UHW3WTstCYtOzdFw434RQ2BcCfybMiJK+eS+ojTyLq9hK6nMWo7iQHy/Rm6+Z7I=
=M0rJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/DrL_jJQTPg=dPg8+1Zt9lTt--