From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6677F1387FD for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42240E0A95; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FC7FE0931 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sf (unknown [178.124.206.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: slyfox) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4291133FE2F; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:36:32 +0300 From: Sergei Trofimovich To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: hasufell@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project Message-ID: <20140610233632.7146a69f@sf> In-Reply-To: <5397636C.4080604@gentoo.org> References: <20140607201920.0e0ccd5c@gentoo.org> <53937778.7020604@sporkbox.us> <20140607230815.07bc18e7@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <5393B6D8.4080201@gentoo.org> <20140608135616.581807d8@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <53947600.50506@gentoo.org> <20140608171543.45bf6ce7@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <53948A21.6020809@gentoo.org> <5396106A.4010209@gentoo.org> <53962AF6.1050500@gentoo.org> <20140610194500.2185800828ffd57eb1947614@gmail.com> <539728FB.3010305@gentoo.org> <20140610204553.7dbb98d661d265380631c6ad@gmail.com> <5397636C.4080604@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/8Dr8lG/h.FG+3MsMW_6TiBE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 76a0dfc8-71c9-409c-82c4-b833313c6bf2 X-Archives-Hash: f6cd4fab54ac27f2f88a2e55cd51a04b --Sig_/8Dr8lG/h.FG+3MsMW_6TiBE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:58:36 +0000 hasufell wrote: > Andrew Savchenko: > > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:49:15 +0200 Alexander Berntsen wrote: > >> On 10/06/14 17:45, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > >>> I don't know why CVS is still used for Gentoo main repository,=20 > >>> probably some infrastructure elements depends deeply on its=20 > >>> internals, because I see of no other reason why Git is still not=20 > >>> used despite efforts ongoing for last several years. > >> Infra can probably speak for themselves, but Portage with its history > >> is crazy big, and git is not great with crazy big projects. > >=20 > > Why are you saying that git is inefficient with large projects? It > > was developed with efficiency in mind in the first place. And > > kernel guys will likely disagree with "git is not great with crazy > > big projects" statement. And with git kernel bisection and other > > complicated (in terms or data manipulation) operations are quite > > fast even on old hardware. > >=20 > > Best regards, > > Andrew Savchenko > >=20 >=20 > interesting read: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/189776 >=20 > Does any1 know what fb currently uses or if any of these issues have > been resolved? >=20 Mercurial + custom plugins: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DDlguc63cRXg --=20 Sergei --Sig_/8Dr8lG/h.FG+3MsMW_6TiBE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlOXbFgACgkQcaHudmEf86qKiQCeLfuM3kfx1VwzWu1XL1VisTgV CW4AnA9upaYchh/4eooQMduGbV14w3Oz =8P4F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/8Dr8lG/h.FG+3MsMW_6TiBE--