From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3B51387FD for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84EF9E089E; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45FF1E082F for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q8so4175750lbi.12 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:39:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=YM99fnGIWsiwq58jSbVwTMbqdXGKjK/2BKGxP0EC7Aw=; b=MXUck6mTOz6Jw8CPo/s8oNiXJJ2G8pufJXQYRTjo/q4mMpeBxYUzI/RbobWDAUbAz0 tB4N9lPw/dS6mwp918KmJQCdiAJ1r37Y753UpaCiT+SV/kpUsGI1KgcDqUoxyeanBmzH u1+ntKmp0pB3jrn10GdKixCgcYw8zuEXUCkpd11TvC7dFUaXrsZz5ZIg52QIukW3cm+r fLpKuaDotRjVg+XK6RldtmQzIbZHzehOWQNbhxGucdVZ/A1Whdxbjzgn3nIBhS2wHzBY TTT/0q6PgZq9NlPVUyxl+KOkZICyn7tx5eJF4CFMDB9nAwSnozEGh+5dkOHqGTFXysS2 dXSQ== X-Received: by 10.152.207.74 with SMTP id lu10mr23709776lac.28.1402421987541; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:39:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([85.143.114.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ob4sm22118611lbc.30.2014.06.10.10.39.45 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:39:30 +0400 From: Andrew Savchenko To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project Message-Id: <20140610213930.0654bd3a77fee84e23958109@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140607230815.07bc18e7@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> References: <20140607201920.0e0ccd5c@gentoo.org> <53937778.7020604@sporkbox.us> <20140607230815.07bc18e7@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__10_Jun_2014_21_39_30_+0400_svF3X5a/sjseLEJw" X-Archives-Salt: a5fc07b0-4695-44b1-8c65-d65cbcff4faf X-Archives-Hash: 144b436f7d6f5038aea8d61de43eb6da --Signature=_Tue__10_Jun_2014_21_39_30_+0400_svF3X5a/sjseLEJw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 23:08:15 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Sat, 07 Jun 2014 15:35:04 -0500 > Daniel Campbell wrote: >=20 > > > [2]: Overview of bugs that involve OpenRC, most for the package > > > itself. https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=3Dopenrc >=20 > > I think working on OpenRC would be a great learning experience for me > > and would be a great opportunity to contribute to Gentoo. >=20 > You can start fixing bugs immediately. You can check out the sources, > write patches and attach the patches to the bug reports. Then all it > takes is someone else to review/commit the patches. And who will review patches made? There are already six push requests pending on OpenRC github for a long time: https://github.com/OpenRC/openrc/pulls And some of them are fixing long-standing severe bugs such as https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D391945 is fixed by: https://github.com/OpenRC/openrc/pull/12 https://github.com/OpenRC/openrc/pull/13 We tested these patches on our infra and they work fine. Though without upstream accepting/reviewing these changes for a long time all enthusiasm dies slowly... I understand that all devs have issues of their own to handle and I don't want to blame anyone due to a lack of time. I just want to point out that lack of contributions is only one side of a problem. Another one is that someone with proper authority should take care of such contributions. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko --Signature=_Tue__10_Jun_2014_21_39_30_+0400_svF3X5a/sjseLEJw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTl0LgAAoJEFZZU7lTcnVshNcP/iyhz2PVPXVZuMbTRVP7JY1r d57JV/B39GrPZQ5u3KjVfpkMdUzFJfKcAPgVnyeDTkHhH2Okj2fpwAZYwRfNRkx4 lZaBoG2Un3Tjn5vTOhfPc+ng8cFNNR/kQQAzUtczrZznD5MJxq8k8VCOuPYumHqP 48IKpk6MWUOLZewi5aJQtiKDAFwKgRplp79VvOOaKO6xnrP3+PFdBcbKJHo8NRBR 7TZI8Bi5qQIkelfAAcuUvTiMl/XM2uNxwDQO3bVZhQNX442A8CEXaGAFP8rNL1lJ 5eJE70g0K0n26KBSMJMZF4hEnzF7PSdgphuMgOaiSNhZFQc2H/bDo8SZ87Orbww0 toEQKI/nb1iUHqu6w1X59C0BGGscsokLaNJnKyUao1jeeNzNMVf51NWdLcIya2+K HJX6jZvoE3c58/GAhYd0edr/eHe2QqNikfMr26KndM0+R2J0GcRl0n3sscZ+BbWH StnG63bZHMCxhnaBS1p6bS2X+6VTf4L/DpytQlBe0YsNWN/M2KarL8uoKWLO3hO/ A1IgnGFR40XI5puTzotc2UqFsjEyQ2vIayUyRpQdtT8KGUBK7cAPPui6LdVONiOh +te79ATdJamnyXlsE5Ybn26EeVaJFbfl2DdAkiwBkFBprovRl6nNVlWeCpp/INRF cfMIZbTgPLc3VSjq4wcd =tUcv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__10_Jun_2014_21_39_30_+0400_svF3X5a/sjseLEJw--