From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FEB1387FD for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C661E0907; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f178.google.com (mail-lb0-f178.google.com [209.85.217.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06E2BE0908 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w7so4032480lbi.23 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:46:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type; bh=0qTL/VtDdn7H2gFAmKlJJOThbS2lVEvPYE0AnNYl0Bw=; b=xd7lg//wSjWE4WjOJzYNQjECEID6oECGJBHLSDff3ssFdB22PAX4ggfk0jphLiGgzx kUXeup6ki3ruSiwti4RVg4qO2aUDtWqAs7aqPZWv1++AyFc/a0hDlJeHuWRv61/emdMa +5exJfL6RgWiNu9zjrU1gpfjfPOkWYWENXPuH5dbpc6p9VzgCEK3DXJlAOnU5tITnP9w Moz/qcrnSaV7wnPaCvEmzC1bh8jM+lwxDH5xBDhaFTK4bqS1UHwFZsnaWt7qDfsS+KXY 7Lku/1nWpyAhYJQ5EZWnQWVdm1mqmOth9A0MyPDZBiHyaNiWe7HPQY2BnKGp2NfnWidv KF5w== X-Received: by 10.112.171.101 with SMTP id at5mr1868481lbc.83.1402418775067; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([85.143.114.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id oc3sm22003154lbb.18.2014.06.10.09.46.12 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:45:53 +0400 From: Andrew Savchenko To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Alexander Berntsen Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project Message-Id: <20140610204553.7dbb98d661d265380631c6ad@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <539728FB.3010305@gentoo.org> References: <20140607201920.0e0ccd5c@gentoo.org> <53937778.7020604@sporkbox.us> <20140607230815.07bc18e7@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <5393B6D8.4080201@gentoo.org> <20140608135616.581807d8@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <53947600.50506@gentoo.org> <20140608171543.45bf6ce7@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <53948A21.6020809@gentoo.org> <5396106A.4010209@gentoo.org> <53962AF6.1050500@gentoo.org> <20140610194500.2185800828ffd57eb1947614@gmail.com> <539728FB.3010305@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__10_Jun_2014_20_45_53_+0400_HPA0Td0+QbLclLjx" X-Archives-Salt: 837db9c4-34d5-4bce-9fb9-9de032f892c9 X-Archives-Hash: 677f391f6a07b7172c5d491599177c37 --Signature=_Tue__10_Jun_2014_20_45_53_+0400_HPA0Td0+QbLclLjx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:49:15 +0200 Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 10/06/14 17:45, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > I don't know why CVS is still used for Gentoo main repository,=20 > > probably some infrastructure elements depends deeply on its=20 > > internals, because I see of no other reason why Git is still not=20 > > used despite efforts ongoing for last several years. > Infra can probably speak for themselves, but Portage with its history > is crazy big, and git is not great with crazy big projects. Why are you saying that git is inefficient with large projects? It was developed with efficiency in mind in the first place. And kernel guys will likely disagree with "git is not great with crazy big projects" statement. And with git kernel bisection and other complicated (in terms or data manipulation) operations are quite fast even on old hardware. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko --Signature=_Tue__10_Jun_2014_20_45_53_+0400_HPA0Td0+QbLclLjx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTlzZTAAoJEFZZU7lTcnVsELQQAJr83rarMrB12TIDWf1OkN+i TaQkzR+l5yjLSb/5iklhKWLi9IBA7pezSKa4bLuhBrw5f+f4KXKwA1vnudABuknY TJU0TZ7Lgyc7oSf7+erjyk58sti6k+sOnO6PIN6aBdaBGj0JF+JF2uKhM6X2GoL+ akIstoxOyLVRvNkx5P4GCNc3L7tlwelQUu2OaISVE+GZUlbZWuLdZbPJSlFjXC9R OpmAA+Qi9qznwEb9aAPeobEGo9g5FGZymYWW2zIt+rlxFLorvzUkhdH5qZfnOKg9 Xxtw2P3vjjyWJdCuHLQCfxDJnhbkXSd3gs/FCykdWS8zwHRhavYQ9Z/JRktJcRgw XphAWIFdBsXk1q/H8enrbk+zGCHykpWmBFyyw4YohL7CxeVSjTvfNkj8X79Su0T+ fZVjws6QqB5E79j1jKeD0/xxfR//rKJJGGnTm0zJHyOsjMxl91b0P1fTGNC9B2sN nzvZEU7q4Dzhs8OWT/eLTduwLhFRIDyaPYLw951dT6ekHMaRnXFvXXGKcQoUO4dC 8QBeD3o24/6ouRjbCaLnWCbiMgZGFuVzsexDXXXFnI2DLDW9BWz1OqHveOqACra/ V9/u66FlWCXny82BA1/zv9kJTz5m3gvxkEhAg3oOXt4upTq0y0OZ7MzNgKDBALoD DQbtHweyPbadED7M7sSq =yax/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__10_Jun_2014_20_45_53_+0400_HPA0Td0+QbLclLjx--