From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C7F1381FA for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EBAFE0B3C; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baptiste.telenet-ops.be (baptiste.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.51]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31D5E0B38 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org ([94.226.51.153]) by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id 9zEV1o00P3JKcCE01zEVdA; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 01:14:30 +0200 Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 01:13:37 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: hasufell@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? Message-ID: <20140604011337.266c9a36@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <538E4DA1.9030707@gentoo.org> References: <53889F70.1090404@gentoo.org> <20140530181022.6b263cde@gentoo.org> <5388B301.1000401@gentoo.org> <20140530191154.382a6738@gentoo.org> <20140530181411.55cd47e8@googlemail.com> <20140530191731.61625620@gentoo.org> <20140603205846.7bce4eee@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20140604001833.090234a3@gentoo.org> <538E4DA1.9030707@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/fcSZfA3ow7nuV.IhX.l1q56"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 0928d2b2-3f74-4421-a0f8-fe969d35e507 X-Archives-Hash: 8b0bcda63d1a7ebceb64a30bae05ea01 --Sig_/fcSZfA3ow7nuV.IhX.l1q56 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:35:13 +0000 hasufell wrote: > Tom Wijsman: > > On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 20:58:46 +0200 > > Jeroen Roovers wrote: > >=20 > >> On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:17:31 +0200 > >> Tom Wijsman wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:14:11 +0100 > >>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >>>> A more reasonable approach would be for the Council to permit the > >>>> tree to contain at most 6 wrong lines at any given time. That way > >>>> any developer wishing to add a new wrong line must previously fix > >>>> an existing wrong line. > >>> > >>> You can suggest that to the Gentoo Council by replying to the > >>> Council agenda thread on the gentoo-project mailing list. > >> > >> whooosh > >> > >> > >> jer > >> > >=20 > > boom splat > >=20 >=20 > Stop spamming and stop telling obvious things. We can write a bot that > gives that kind of information. We can also write a bot that points out that it is "nonsense", "doesn't matter" and "breakage" as in your original response to this sub thread. Can you instead tell us what you think makes sense, matters and works? In this case, for me; whooosh boom splat makes sense, matters and works. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/fcSZfA3ow7nuV.IhX.l1q56 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTjlaiAAoJEPWZc8roOL/Q/CAH/jp+6YEfk+I6I+DF7f2T52Uy YBhk6eDicIal6nn3LBbG9Ty/wfgdgaRq72vmR+gqlbZnWHzTlaSzD+IUFDGFRj25 Dp8B2Ik7JKPdtwUe+LtYyn15SPWDyWC4P14YGaQR5/RHArqGnZ+UsDjmEbGpcKFo 6thBI4BPjVFZsXDZndkPaKq3ncVEpbbZ2V2fULvhR8A21JlaL6mLvxvKL+j+Jp6Y yPhqYFZ7iKkXB/rA3U6Yxc9VyCqya7IJKiaVzb07OWQhuZVwkdZA8pxg7BDg9AC4 b/WB/Dhn21J82UcDQMI0P2oVKOtzbDYqBKLW4puIgFAkDVnKQZ4cvOnViG76ec4= =TiNH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/fcSZfA3ow7nuV.IhX.l1q56--