From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283201381FA for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1783AE0A8C; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26D88E0898 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from marga.jer-c2.orkz.net (D4B2706A.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [212.178.112.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jer) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF96A33FAD3 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:03:14 +0200 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs Message-ID: <20140602150314.25f8057f@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <5389013B.7080909@gentoo.org> References: <53269FE3.7060602@gentoo.org> <538646D5.6090601@gentoo.org> <5389013B.7080909@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c1c01370-e18b-4593-8225-83e8848bf809 X-Archives-Hash: 728c80c611683e810ea5a06310d7eb61 On Fri, 30 May 2014 23:07:55 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote: > On 05/28/2014 09:32 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > Perhaps it makes more sense to disband the herd and put all packages > > except the ones you use up for grabs? > I suppose so. Let me have a look and see how many packages belong to > that herd and then I will see what to do. You should maybe wait a few weeks. It wouldn't make sense to first call on developers to join an existing structure, and to then immediately tear it down leaving them to pick up the pieces. jer