From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6E01381FA for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 17:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F780E0913; Fri, 30 May 2014 17:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C563E0905 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 17:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id bs8so1519128wib.12 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:14:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=FBNuPR2RpQigGaYjO0SzRlgqmZu7/nYQRS5RYXqxykE=; b=n8sYh22HGh7ynxL62vgCL+Shj425tbSMIZ22VCDI7vpxyZQ5fLbt3d6CXkuF+OH/sE G0hQMkshtZc4/tV5ub0ymisDyhB9UbzD/UiixZx776OGuX9nU2ySK+XblBgyxexcXqSt ketSVwgxEsK9KrUXXTYeavBO6lVFymfbJr0rzd9li9t8v9wlyBoOPGfxZHP9sSMpeuNQ rHToQpoSBk26jV7N/FG4+NNeBKoXiEdJjhoZahEoPUPK7uterLvjEKEQDp7Sjms/1c/k yz3LtucPKD15EFNTU/GPJ3CQVZZzOrhddREmH2s6tRsmPRRkV67g96bp3o3T35sBnVbN R/oQ== X-Received: by 10.180.73.201 with SMTP id n9mr8620215wiv.45.1401470059062; Fri, 30 May 2014 10:14:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc2-broo7-2-0-cust637.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.11.186.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gm8sm7467891wib.23.2014.05.30.10.14.16 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 May 2014 10:14:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 18:14:11 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? Message-ID: <20140530181411.55cd47e8@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140530191154.382a6738@gentoo.org> References: <53889F70.1090404@gentoo.org> <20140530181022.6b263cde@gentoo.org> <5388B301.1000401@gentoo.org> <20140530191154.382a6738@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/B+6raaDpf4+kRleZx9s6oyh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a3e42de5-310c-4f50-8850-249c92305a12 X-Archives-Hash: 0fe62b2b53cd39e58955faa2dfe5b22b --Sig_/B+6raaDpf4+kRleZx9s6oyh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 30 May 2014 19:11:54 +0200 Tom Wijsman wrote: > Well, let's just mask the whole tree; there are wrong lines > everywhere. A more reasonable approach would be for the Council to permit the tree to contain at most 6 wrong lines at any given time. That way any developer wishing to add a new wrong line must previously fix an existing wrong line. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/B+6raaDpf4+kRleZx9s6oyh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlOIvGYACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHAuQCdHmbaqbJv/UCkOlFknAscu/Kq 4/kAnRA1XrYkyoITy5cofmA4aT07IqM0 =nUs2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/B+6raaDpf4+kRleZx9s6oyh--