From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FE61387FD for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:14:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF2D4E0BFD; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com [209.85.212.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B77B0E0BDD for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cc10so998980wib.4 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:14:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=klw581/38XFgSDi6zJ1RO6vXanRK01kQCwUT9s+v3x4=; b=cnlTo1EPwtprx8mlkJFGstB+8IwWeohSahejJBAwTnn4KiZnuYIGRECVrDx0MUUoxo DNOup2xoFMMy3NzA/LsYRnxyb7xdeKyII7s/wSVdR1rwTCeHdQ++DvHQvd5Fpuvf94ur qBs3CqapnUqDgfIjQtqoI4MKBDo4qyQwGxuCqtmuRCFvX011eSenNyzEvGZyj5p3+fYh L5gsou7hwOfaMzVi6GFlA/mxcHMHi6nANfn3uU7skzytTuiD2mzxaIzBKInT7qPDtYmp xo7UR0in0wrV5Hk9h/dvLm5j/Qxomu7sz3JFlylWaqgtPEidx7maoC/ZtBOaKGBXUQhS zpuQ== X-Received: by 10.180.106.167 with SMTP id gv7mr49432590wib.40.1396026873482; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc3-broo7-2-0-cust157.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.30.224.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ga10sm60050wjb.23.2014.03.28.10.14.33 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:14:27 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags Message-ID: <20140328171427.57c24f02@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140327035347.6434671a@gentoo.org> References: <20140323154609.1625d525@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20140324123619.5fca27ee@deathstar> <20140324152512.45516d0a@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20140325080308.09d349bc@deathstar> <20140325183145.60dc07e2@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20140327035347.6434671a@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/BS6XImTS+JR6DmIg=1j1VW0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 74ffe37f-47c4-438c-9421-c36b2b9c502f X-Archives-Hash: 75ca9cb56d09f4872a5b1fe5d9934ad4 --Sig_/BS6XImTS+JR6DmIg=1j1VW0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 03:53:47 +0100 yac wrote: > What I was describing is the difference between fundamental properties > of categories and tags. You are trying to redefine categories in terms of a concept that they didn't originally represent. From a package mangler perspective, categories aren't just "a label" for a package. They're fundamentally part of a package's name. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/BS6XImTS+JR6DmIg=1j1VW0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlM1rfUACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFzNgCgl5TvWHMAwxl3hRkmsBQijhmN 9jwAoIAvAEMx+YKIcLb6KFCXIRcyj/VG =oODy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/BS6XImTS+JR6DmIg=1j1VW0--