From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7244C13873B for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 06:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4AD1E0B2D; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 06:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout.karoo.kcom.com (smtpout.karoo.kcom.com [212.50.160.34]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FA4E0AE9 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 06:25:18 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,566,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="66769734" Received: from unknown (HELO rathaus.eclipse.co.uk) ([82.153.97.237]) by smtpout.karoo.kcom.com with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2014 06:25:17 +0000 Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 06:40:07 +0000 From: "Steven J. Long" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: FHS or not (WAS: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11) Message-ID: <20140301064007.GA3019@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <530F38CB.4090608@gentoo.org> <53106FE4.9080804@gentoo.org> <531079D9.801@gentoo.org> <5310B267.7040506@gentoo.org> <20140228180927.GA21798@laptop.home> <5311063B.8050406@googlemail.com> <20140301000335.GA23326@laptop.home> <53116E18.80902@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53116E18.80902@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: bad147c3-2318-4a3e-9a42-0495254a0b43 X-Archives-Hash: 7458615b92d72b1b918907d4ac80354f On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 07:20:24AM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: > If only Portage had supported checking if files from /usr were used by > files installed to / > Hard to create check for every case, but something like libraries and NEEDED > entries (bug 443590) would have been a start > But there simply wasn't enough popular demand for sep. /usr, so nobody > was willing to do the work Actually when I proposed working on exactly that (twice), for both initramfs and traditional usr setups, you and mgorny shouted me down, diverting it into a discussion about how I was a "hater" for not seeing why I should change anything on my systems. That's why there was no demand: every halfway-sane proposal at collaboration was turned into an insane argument. No-one with any self-respect would want to collaborate with people who treat them like that. Neat bit of revisionism though; I almost thought you cared about us old fusties for a moment there. -- #friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-)