From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F0F138E20 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 03:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF571E0BAE; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 03:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83A2FE0B3F for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 03:19:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (c-75-73-165-249.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [75.73.165.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dberkholz) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9619233FBF0 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 03:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:19:50 -0600 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493) Message-ID: <20140221031950.GD8819@comet.hsd1.mn.comcast.net> References: <20140211223913.GB26141@fury> <1392160421.31609.2.camel@kanae> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1392160421.31609.2.camel@kanae> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Archives-Salt: 60f6db0d-c737-4609-8ef2-4b2637c41fa4 X-Archives-Hash: 278122931549f034a0c4633af90e8f62 --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 00:13 Wed 12 Feb , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > Right now, I don't really get the point of this discussion given all the > precedent threads about this, be it 2 years ago and 8-10 years ago. I spent a while tonight digging up this post from 2005, which nicely=20 describes where we were with gtk1 vs gtk2 back then. http://marc.info/?l=3Dgentoo-dev&m=3D111212920310822&w=3D2 --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Council Member / Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux Analyst, RedMonk --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJTBsXWXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxNzkxRTlGNzM0M0VCNzE1ODBBQzJEQjAx QzRBMjY4OUE2RENCMjQyAAoJEBxKJomm3LJC50cP/3FrKpARAl0kC1Q1B8ZaYCJp 2uT5qXiPSbQEIuXw+mNqyDELkMrRvCNalYJp+OnnI0uid8q3PGDflt0dQcFZslvX P/O14xlSznWWjuJ/xpkR9AMkQkeIFkuPSEqZ22D66pa4YwSihMFIZgqGIJdaEd0/ byX+i9kUJ7WhPpAyepDiGgRYHyjIKLhGZuRBpmR2saqjmLpTdo7RpmXSIFAae1Fa 1UPFDjNUNf9Ee/wzHJHzIeHRrnh7bB1EKhCxokZx0I70XkTR9MuHAOWlEtGcf1TC 90RVQJ8mRRe6KNIFY3QK0StJVN8qIcWbQ83F04FMkGacsDSR9cdEfet6dxsbPe+v Zp/WJ4Fgs96w7RrXZeFJLoChaHrvCy6zM8Lsf4VXrRCskOzm8D80IDyVekGOkDB/ 61v3wQzRZwrds6eUk0x7kEgQwMmlAVcOgOC3u32cHidzNoDddmWfI4CT97y/0QOI thi3maMvTaOSAHrntSFDDy99hFghnJmMj56UaUi4YxeUs6Wr/8apD/is0/tRDqos qv2GR8xqGsaL2mZs+9kw68EDGtK78woBO5NDezzT7W6ovMTgqsbnS5S40Vo/abWl NXTaXSbrFqpF+eFlpf5JpnYTpsSrvJEoKnxVdfyb0NG7ErmMGbfaEsaJHlnuMlSA O7vd8hYg6A377CNODxFb =4OYt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T--