public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@gentoo.org>
To: ulm@gentoo.org
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:20:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140210182027.2469bc1d@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21240.63682.2569.943869@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2034 bytes --]

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:05:22 +0100
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:

> >>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014, Rich Freeman wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
> > wrote:
> >> I'd rather argue in terms of time instead of version numbers,
> >> because of the upgrade path for old systems. We guarantee one year
> >> for stable systems, but IMHO we should be more conservative for
> >> EAPI deprecation and go for two or three years there.
> 
> > By EAPI deprecation it is meant that we discourage using the old
> > EAPI in the tree.
> 
> Right, the above was about ebuilds in the tree, not about package
> managers. At least sys-apps/portage and its dependencies must stay at
> an EAPI that is stable long enough to allow an upgrade of old systems
> (where Portage might not recognise the newest EAPI).

Yes, besides the way we deprecate it we should also be clear in our
wording what this all pertains to; a broad statement can has its effect
in the Portage tree, the package manager, the upgrade path, the vdb and
possibly more. Otherwise we get what Patrick describes; a warning in
repoman, with nearly no progress wrt its removal in the Portage tree.

> > Removing support for it from a package manager should of course
> > happen much later (well after it is banned).
> 
> The package manager must be able to uninstall old packages, which
> essentially means that support for old EAPIs cannot be removed.

That's only a subset of the entire EAPI, which could be separately
still supported; while no longer supporting the majority of it, for
example, whether src_prepare is supported doesn't really matter anymore
when you are uninstalling a package. One could make up a list; however,
it's not a problem yet, it might become one in 10 years or so...

-- 
With kind regards,

Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer

E-mail address  : TomWij@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key  : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2  ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-10 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-10 12:43 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules Patrick Lauer
2014-02-10 13:03 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2014-02-10 13:21   ` Tom Wijsman
2014-02-10 13:24     ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2014-02-10 14:23       ` Tom Wijsman
2014-02-10 14:41         ` Rich Freeman
2014-02-10 14:58           ` Tom Wijsman
2014-02-10 16:16             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2014-02-10 17:08               ` Tom Wijsman
2014-02-10 13:23 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-02-10 13:46   ` Patrick Lauer
2014-02-10 14:07     ` Rich Freeman
2014-02-10 14:25     ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-02-10 15:31     ` Ulrich Mueller
2014-02-10 15:42       ` Rich Freeman
2014-02-10 16:05         ` Ulrich Mueller
2014-02-10 16:26           ` Alan McKinnon
2014-02-10 20:56             ` Alec Warner
2014-02-10 21:26               ` Alan McKinnon
2014-02-10 17:20           ` Tom Wijsman [this message]
2014-02-10 17:47             ` Rich Freeman
2014-02-10 19:04     ` Lars Wendler
2014-02-10 14:35   ` Tom Wijsman
2014-02-10 15:34     ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-02-10 13:34 ` Rich Freeman
2014-02-10 13:44   ` Patrick Lauer
2014-02-10 14:52   ` Tom Wijsman
2014-02-12  5:07 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140210182027.2469bc1d@TOMWIJ-GENTOO \
    --to=tomwij@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=ulm@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox