From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60DF138B43 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 10:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6ED13E0BB9; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 10:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from michel.telenet-ops.be (michel.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.88]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DA0E0B56 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 10:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by michel.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id NyCT1n01l2khLEN06yCUhF; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:12:28 +0100 Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:10:53 +0100 From: Tom Wijsman To: 1i5t5.duncan@cox.net Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: dropping redundant stable keywords Message-ID: <20140206111053.5437aef5@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: References: <52E7DBC1.5020102@gentoo.org> <20140128182304.7d458a17@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20140203062524.GA7467@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <20140203104341.2add2760@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20140204210319.GA1935@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <20140205010833.1bcf8dca@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <1391559808.3520.2.camel@oswin.hackershack.net> <20140205020742.048cef9f@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <1391564122.3520.4.camel@oswin.hackershack.net> <20140205024806.7d08cb63@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <1391570147.3520.7.camel@oswin.hackershack.net> <20140205064109.57ed842c@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <52F22386.3000801@gentoo.org> <20140205125859.75af1268@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20140205135822.011a6a25@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e07426c6-e502-4261-b50f-ab841d5571b4 X-Archives-Hash: 8f7bb4aaefede83c16671670f20b2e2a On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > Tom Wijsman posted on Wed, 05 Feb 2014 13:58:22 +0100 as excerpted: > > > Can we do something about our growing queue when fixing is > > insufficient? > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/chart.cgi?category=-All-&datefrom=&dateto=&label0=All%20Open&line0=320&name=320&subcategory=-All-&action=wrap > > > > PS: As a bonus, here's a nice view of our stabilization queue over > > time: > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/chart.cgi?category=Gentoo+Linux&subcategory=Keywording+and+Stabilization&name=639&label0=All+Open&line0=639&datefrom=&dateto=&action-wrap=Chart+This+List > > > > Notice how the graph goes down near the dates the threads were made; > > although, if you would draw an average it would appear to be > > growing. > > Both those links give me this: > > Sorry, you aren't a member of the 'editbugs' group, and > so you are not authorized to use the "New Charts" feature. > > =:^( > http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomwij/files/bgo-all-open-bugs.png http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomwij/files/bgo-all-open-key-and-stable.png Hmm, I think that certain usage of it can cause quite a server load; and that because of that this is in place, perhaps even by default. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D