From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-64730-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EC01380DC
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed,  5 Feb 2014 21:52:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95404E0D6E;
	Wed,  5 Feb 2014 21:52:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from michel.telenet-ops.be (michel.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.88])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87237E0CF1
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  5 Feb 2014 21:52:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127])
	by michel.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp
	id NlsW1n00g2khLEN06lsWpj; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 22:52:30 +0100
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 22:50:57 +0100
From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: dropping redundant stable keywords
Message-ID: <20140205225057.4a7c03d6@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
In-Reply-To: <1391617561.3160.10.camel@oswin.hackershack.net>
References: <52E7DBC1.5020102@gentoo.org>
	<20140128182304.7d458a17@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net>
	<CAGfcS_nsbNrSKVpg3TJbRnbRcc5BqL2-aOK1twE7vxv2tZ8sZg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140203062524.GA7467@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>
	<20140203104341.2add2760@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
	<20140204210319.GA1935@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>
	<20140205010833.1bcf8dca@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
	<1391559808.3520.2.camel@oswin.hackershack.net>
	<20140205020742.048cef9f@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
	<1391564122.3520.4.camel@oswin.hackershack.net>
	<20140205024806.7d08cb63@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
	<1391570147.3520.7.camel@oswin.hackershack.net>
	<CAGfcS_=SnpeZv4XqcUBcMTgug2p+o9jNt38bokXPHigd8iU+BQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1391617561.3160.10.camel@oswin.hackershack.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 639e315d-4ea4-4224-98cb-b455b6a92240
X-Archives-Hash: d4a01ecfed1900588f3e740cfabd4ca9

On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:26:01 -0600
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@gentoo.org> wrote:

> There is more to it than that.  Normally discussions can be good, but
> when you try to talk to a brick wall, it's absolutely pointless.

QA team's decisions require more than a flip of a dime; it takes a
little more involvement, as well as solid evidence and reasoning.

-- 
With kind regards,

Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer

E-mail address  : TomWij@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key  : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2  ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D