From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E8F1380DC for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 21:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C421E0D54; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 21:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.telenet-ops.be (albert.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.90]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBA0E0B0D for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 21:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by albert.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id NlQt1n00q2khLEN06lQtYH; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 22:24:53 +0100 Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 22:23:18 +0100 From: Tom Wijsman To: peter@stuge.se Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] Re: Re: dropping redundant stable keywords Message-ID: <20140205222318.6dbef31c@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <20140205201846.8735.qmail@stuge.se> References: <20140203104341.2add2760@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20140204210319.GA1935@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <20140205010833.1bcf8dca@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <1391559808.3520.2.camel@oswin.hackershack.net> <20140205020742.048cef9f@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <1391564122.3520.4.camel@oswin.hackershack.net> <20140205024806.7d08cb63@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <1391570147.3520.7.camel@oswin.hackershack.net> <20140205064109.57ed842c@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20140205201846.8735.qmail@stuge.se> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0d4244a4-ab1b-4ceb-a894-ed6c85893aac X-Archives-Hash: 3fc39261dea1f2c2e15948981e84e80b On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 21:18:46 +0100 Peter Stuge wrote: > Tom Wijsman wrote: > > > Thanks for putting up with it, but it's a huge waste of your time. > > > > Why? > > Because you seem to have a completely different mindset than > everybody else, and not in a good way. :\ That "everybody else" a broad generaliation, make a count and see how it is a rather small set of individuals; noteworthy with that, is that it is about different subtopics over this thread. Exactly, because different solutions were proposed by both sides; and thus, there's naturally some agreement (not so visual) and disagreement (more visual) going on here. That's a good thing, it works out those solutions. > I told you on IRC that I don't think your approach is good for Gentoo > but I was, and still am, unable to say exactly what is going on. At a > minimum there is a severe communication problem but maybe there's > also something else. Why? -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D