From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2141380DC for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D872E0C1A; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99396E0B9E for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 2274) id BC90833F86B; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 10:48:21 -0800 From: Tim Harder To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Jauhien Piatlicki Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Add support for rsync patches Message-ID: <20140205184821.GD29332@basil.av1.ca.us.gaikai.int> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Jauhien Piatlicki References: <52E78D95.7080409@gmail.com> <20140204195332.GB5217@comet.hsd1.mn.comcast.net> <52F15AAC.7050606@gmail.com> <2242447.mC1FDm2MVb@vapier> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2242447.mC1FDm2MVb@vapier> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Archives-Salt: 308a2fe5-7936-4216-ba75-1ffa0f693125 X-Archives-Hash: 43b4e7211c54e8038c486e6ceecad1a1 --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2014-02-05 00:13, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i don't see any patches in rsync-3.1.0. i'd be hesitant to add support f= or=20 > them even if they were there ... They're in a different tarball [1], and yes I agree that it would be best to use epatch_user or similar. Tim [1]: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-patches-3.1.0.tar.gz --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJS8od1AAoJEEqz6FtPBkyjnCwH/0/XjZ+Gqpl5WsGFDmpSSoHT 3ExZJrkCu3TCn3I4h2bSeOyJpXDTVqMTp9lQF/F+4q7tuLmXgz2hOrogag+abjOj fg1awBO1WQYsYU40w3m3kIXWux/y/u6mGprQvSFIjxdaREc/eAbrjLIIrxpbL1H7 aGa1UX3HuO+uY96JPJBHDSqqrRX3QqWNZVmooVE+t7JGCkSI+pzuQ9fERIMxRqrS iQ6XSY7s5UXKHRJENRjsGm6KknSLA5BPd2ImdrOmadj2wVrpNanBwy2zvHiScqXk zw9AePWvYRGjr9SK02510aksrFQo2x4RuXKMbrbxkksUy8/8feBFym7LNBaKoB4= =hUhX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--