From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B501380DC for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 871ABE0BD9; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94233E0BA0 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:59:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from marga.jer-c2.orkz.net (D4B2706A.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [212.178.112.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jer) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9924333F946 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:59:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 12:58:59 +0100 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: dropping redundant stable keywords Message-ID: <20140205125859.75af1268@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <52F22386.3000801@gentoo.org> References: <52E7DBC1.5020102@gentoo.org> <20140128182304.7d458a17@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20140203062524.GA7467@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <20140203104341.2add2760@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20140204210319.GA1935@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <20140205010833.1bcf8dca@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <1391559808.3520.2.camel@oswin.hackershack.net> <20140205020742.048cef9f@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <1391564122.3520.4.camel@oswin.hackershack.net> <20140205024806.7d08cb63@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <1391570147.3520.7.camel@oswin.hackershack.net> <20140205064109.57ed842c@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <52F22386.3000801@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e45c1d8a-62f2-4d12-b739-1a03faac6408 X-Archives-Hash: 002ded33f9500b823102bd687f376e43 On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:41:58 +0400 Sergey Popov wrote: > Cause it seems that not everybody agrees with policy that we are > trying to make. Because it's impossible to create a simple policy to solve complex problems. It's a waste of time and it's going to break more than you set out to fix. Use common sense => communicate => resolve issues individually. If you can't figure things out amongst yourselves, put the matter to this mailing list instead of bringing it to some kind of "tribunal" - more visibility gets you more attention from volunteers and gets actual work done more quickly. Gentoo users and developers (should) just want to scratch their itches - not have endless arguments about them. Can we go back to fixing bugs now? Regards, jer