From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-64593-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C32138A1F
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:36:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CCF7E0D2F;
	Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:35:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com (mail-wg0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2FCBE0DF3
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:35:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n12so3560487wgh.4
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:35:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type;
        bh=WQ7urpya3zay9D/p7A6+q54gPLg1xVO9vSMI6kLO+BU=;
        b=CipiXE//0ENlrBftL5HeV17pU/bFZkQ+ilhdLQgvla2uhNL/OvYt640hxAMGTXjafh
         OCwfkOj3hia8t3zpQgv+j1lRhNu0HV/YahDBQLxYWjGc1x7TgjoVynbRkjeEHgnHQFXC
         Q4OST2x7UT6P3Ec7ITUbh30LXId+1aDAtNGJUWik/do/pba15onYCYPE0QE/rBmMixD+
         jPCiKQLRvea3JA05iuiMN2YzRdWO3H/CIM7oxgHAcgnDT/yKkFrQVEYjuJuX7l7F9mfn
         eN8Lw6dNuKZLDDBdvdCrlkOXcUPGtjK22c8XrMc1Jy97NbmFm3VeIdY1nVydSPRZoUDP
         zUdQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.10.105 with SMTP id h9mr9918738wib.11.1390772136729;
        Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (cpc3-broo7-2-0-cust157.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.30.224.158])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a9sm24254570wiy.10.2014.01.26.13.35.35
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:35:27 +0000
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with XDG directories in ebuild environment
Message-ID: <20140126213527.1f5f6192@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAr7Pr8FT=yrOyxhjLShCwzpOy1LaUdEhNbTXYq9mLZbSPr5rg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJ0EP42143-BM5sQHbjP4ua-F-GMzQKk-23_BGMb=EjCDK59iw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140125221628.26f3aa96@pomiot.lan>
	<CAJ0EP43YYh50tjuhmfm05mLAckoQLM-u+XqNkS1izuky6q09jg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ0EP413Gey7GiZ4WqvWA1wvPeeoGtRu0cgb0_OqnZB3E0EsAA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAr7Pr9y1ohMviTCCU4n6-6AvJkUCzfeQiMAgLOWEK--zH+QFg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140126204926.33f2baef@googlemail.com>
	<CAAr7Pr8FT=yrOyxhjLShCwzpOy1LaUdEhNbTXYq9mLZbSPr5rg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 boundary="Sig_/EiUok9RuOx0MfBHAfUcZ+7="; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: f368fe62-46bc-41ed-bd30-17d51e957acd
X-Archives-Hash: 684454a4d3b6696fe28092fee3800ba6

--Sig_/EiUok9RuOx0MfBHAfUcZ+7=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:21:44 -0800
Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Sorry, I work on Portage. What I'm saying is that We are free to
> change the behavior of *portage* now; rather than waiting for a new
> EAPI. If an ebuild needs to define EAPI=3Deapi-next to 'correctly' use
> XDG_*, well that is someone else's can of worms.

Changing Portage to hide the issue is a bad idea, since it makes it
harder for developers to notice that that's a problem they need to fix.
Although maybe you could set XDG_* to something that will give a big
noisy sandbox violation for current EAPIs?

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh

--Sig_/EiUok9RuOx0MfBHAfUcZ+7=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlLlf6QACgkQ96zL6DUtXhG+OwCfYr/Ya/N73hoUBisyJhcQYWRg
mIgAnRksUeY3ubaJ/2Sz12+CYRMp8htS
=hOsG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/EiUok9RuOx0MfBHAfUcZ+7=--